Advanced search
1 file | 454.33 KB Add to list

Observer bias in animal behaviour research: can we believe what we score, if we score what we believe?

(2014) ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR. 90. p.273-280
Author
Organization
Keywords
information bias, expectation bias, panting score, qualitative behaviour assessment, behaviour scoring, animal welfare, cognitive bias, confirmation bias, double-blind experiment, PIGS, RATINGS, observer bias, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS, WELFARE ASSESSMENT, FEEDLOT CATTLE, REPEATABILITY, INDICATORS, ASSESSORS, LAMENESS, OUTCOMES

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 454.33 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Tuyttens, Frank, Sophie de Graaf, Jasper LT Heerkens, et al. “Observer Bias in Animal Behaviour Research: Can We Believe What We Score, If We Score What We Believe?” ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR 2014 : 273–280. Print.
APA
Tuyttens, Frank, de Graaf, S., Heerkens, J. L., Jacobs, L., Nalon, E., Ott, S., Stadig, L., et al. (2014). Observer bias in animal behaviour research: can we believe what we score, if we score what we believe? ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR.
Chicago author-date
Tuyttens, Frank, Sophie de Graaf, Jasper LT Heerkens, Leonie Jacobs, Elena Nalon, Sanne Ott, Lisanne Stadig, Van laerEva, and Bart Ampe. 2014. “Observer Bias in Animal Behaviour Research: Can We Believe What We Score, If We Score What We Believe?” Animal Behaviour.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Tuyttens, Frank, Sophie de Graaf, Jasper LT Heerkens, Leonie Jacobs, Elena Nalon, Sanne Ott, Lisanne Stadig, Van laerEva, and Bart Ampe. 2014. “Observer Bias in Animal Behaviour Research: Can We Believe What We Score, If We Score What We Believe?” Animal Behaviour.
Vancouver
1.
Tuyttens F, de Graaf S, Heerkens JL, Jacobs L, Nalon E, Ott S, et al. Observer bias in animal behaviour research: can we believe what we score, if we score what we believe? ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR. 2014. p. 273–80.
IEEE
[1]
F. Tuyttens et al., “Observer bias in animal behaviour research: can we believe what we score, if we score what we believe?,” ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, vol. 90. pp. 273–280, 2014.
@misc{4355034,
  author       = {Tuyttens, Frank and de Graaf, Sophie and Heerkens, Jasper LT and Jacobs, Leonie and Nalon, Elena and Ott, Sanne and Stadig, Lisanne and Van laer, Eva and Ampe, Bart},
  issn         = {0003-3472},
  keywords     = {information bias,expectation bias,panting score,qualitative behaviour assessment,behaviour scoring,animal welfare,cognitive bias,confirmation bias,double-blind experiment,PIGS,RATINGS,observer bias,RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS,WELFARE ASSESSMENT,FEEDLOT CATTLE,REPEATABILITY,INDICATORS,ASSESSORS,LAMENESS,OUTCOMES},
  language     = {eng},
  pages        = {273--280},
  series       = {ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR},
  title        = {Observer bias in animal behaviour research: can we believe what we score, if we score what we believe?},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.02.007},
  volume       = {90},
  year         = {2014},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: