Medical homes versus individual practice in primary care impact on health care expenditures
- Author
- Julian Perelman, Isabelle Roch, Isabelle Heymans, Catherine Moureaux, Raphael Lagasse, Lieven Annemans (UGent) and Marie-Christine Closon
- Organization
- Abstract
- Background: The medical home (MH) model has prompted increasing attention given its potential to improve quality of care while reducing health expenditures. Objectives: We compare overall and specific health care expenditures in Belgium, from the third-party payer perspective (compulsory social insurance), between patients treated at individual practices (IP) and at MHs. We compare the sociodemographic profile of MH and IP users. Research Design: This is a retrospective study using public insurance claims data. Generalized linear models estimate the impact on health expenditures of being treated at a MH versus IP, controlling for individual, and area-based sociodemographic characteristics. The choice of primary care setting is modeled using logistic regressions. Subjects: A random sample of 43,678 persons followed during the year 2004. Measures: Third-party payer expenditures for primary care, secondary care consultations, pharmaceuticals, laboratory tests, acute and long-term inpatient care. Results: Overall third-party payer expenditures do not differ significantly between MH and IP users ((sic)+27). Third-party payer primary care expenditures are higher for MH than for IP users ((sic)+129), but this difference is offset by lower expenditures for secondary care consultations ((sic)-11), drugs ((sic)-40), laboratory tests ((sic)-5) and acute and long-term inpatient care ((sic)-53). MHs attract younger and more underprivileged populations. Conclusions: MHs induce a shift in expenditures from secondary care, drugs, and laboratory tests to primary care, while treating a less economically favored population. Combined with positive results regarding quality, MH structures are a promising way to tackle the challenges of primary care.
- Keywords
- health care expenditures, socioeconomic characteristics, PHYSICIAN, FINANCIAL INCENTIVES, primary care, medical home
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 122.53 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-4303678
- MLA
- Perelman, Julian, et al. “Medical Homes versus Individual Practice in Primary Care Impact on Health Care Expenditures.” MEDICAL CARE, vol. 51, no. 8, 2013, pp. 682–88, doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318293c2df.
- APA
- Perelman, J., Roch, I., Heymans, I., Moureaux, C., Lagasse, R., Annemans, L., & Closon, M.-C. (2013). Medical homes versus individual practice in primary care impact on health care expenditures. MEDICAL CARE, 51(8), 682–688. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e318293c2df
- Chicago author-date
- Perelman, Julian, Isabelle Roch, Isabelle Heymans, Catherine Moureaux, Raphael Lagasse, Lieven Annemans, and Marie-Christine Closon. 2013. “Medical Homes versus Individual Practice in Primary Care Impact on Health Care Expenditures.” MEDICAL CARE 51 (8): 682–88. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e318293c2df.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Perelman, Julian, Isabelle Roch, Isabelle Heymans, Catherine Moureaux, Raphael Lagasse, Lieven Annemans, and Marie-Christine Closon. 2013. “Medical Homes versus Individual Practice in Primary Care Impact on Health Care Expenditures.” MEDICAL CARE 51 (8): 682–688. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318293c2df.
- Vancouver
- 1.Perelman J, Roch I, Heymans I, Moureaux C, Lagasse R, Annemans L, et al. Medical homes versus individual practice in primary care impact on health care expenditures. MEDICAL CARE. 2013;51(8):682–8.
- IEEE
- [1]J. Perelman et al., “Medical homes versus individual practice in primary care impact on health care expenditures,” MEDICAL CARE, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 682–688, 2013.
@article{4303678,
abstract = {{Background: The medical home (MH) model has prompted increasing attention given its potential to improve quality of care while reducing health expenditures.
Objectives: We compare overall and specific health care expenditures in Belgium, from the third-party payer perspective (compulsory social insurance), between patients treated at individual practices (IP) and at MHs. We compare the sociodemographic profile of MH and IP users.
Research Design: This is a retrospective study using public insurance claims data. Generalized linear models estimate the impact on health expenditures of being treated at a MH versus IP, controlling for individual, and area-based sociodemographic characteristics. The choice of primary care setting is modeled using logistic regressions.
Subjects: A random sample of 43,678 persons followed during the year 2004.
Measures: Third-party payer expenditures for primary care, secondary care consultations, pharmaceuticals, laboratory tests, acute and long-term inpatient care.
Results: Overall third-party payer expenditures do not differ significantly between MH and IP users ((sic)+27). Third-party payer primary care expenditures are higher for MH than for IP users ((sic)+129), but this difference is offset by lower expenditures for secondary care consultations ((sic)-11), drugs ((sic)-40), laboratory tests ((sic)-5) and acute and long-term inpatient care ((sic)-53). MHs attract younger and more underprivileged populations.
Conclusions: MHs induce a shift in expenditures from secondary care, drugs, and laboratory tests to primary care, while treating a less economically favored population. Combined with positive results regarding quality, MH structures are a promising way to tackle the challenges of primary care.}},
author = {{Perelman, Julian and Roch, Isabelle and Heymans, Isabelle and Moureaux, Catherine and Lagasse, Raphael and Annemans, Lieven and Closon, Marie-Christine}},
issn = {{0025-7079}},
journal = {{MEDICAL CARE}},
keywords = {{health care expenditures,socioeconomic characteristics,PHYSICIAN,FINANCIAL INCENTIVES,primary care,medical home}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{8}},
pages = {{682--688}},
title = {{Medical homes versus individual practice in primary care impact on health care expenditures}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e318293c2df}},
volume = {{51}},
year = {{2013}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: