Advanced search
1 file | 122.53 KB Add to list

Medical homes versus individual practice in primary care impact on health care expenditures

(2013) MEDICAL CARE. 51(8). p.682-688
Author
Organization
Abstract
Background: The medical home (MH) model has prompted increasing attention given its potential to improve quality of care while reducing health expenditures. Objectives: We compare overall and specific health care expenditures in Belgium, from the third-party payer perspective (compulsory social insurance), between patients treated at individual practices (IP) and at MHs. We compare the sociodemographic profile of MH and IP users. Research Design: This is a retrospective study using public insurance claims data. Generalized linear models estimate the impact on health expenditures of being treated at a MH versus IP, controlling for individual, and area-based sociodemographic characteristics. The choice of primary care setting is modeled using logistic regressions. Subjects: A random sample of 43,678 persons followed during the year 2004. Measures: Third-party payer expenditures for primary care, secondary care consultations, pharmaceuticals, laboratory tests, acute and long-term inpatient care. Results: Overall third-party payer expenditures do not differ significantly between MH and IP users ((sic)+27). Third-party payer primary care expenditures are higher for MH than for IP users ((sic)+129), but this difference is offset by lower expenditures for secondary care consultations ((sic)-11), drugs ((sic)-40), laboratory tests ((sic)-5) and acute and long-term inpatient care ((sic)-53). MHs attract younger and more underprivileged populations. Conclusions: MHs induce a shift in expenditures from secondary care, drugs, and laboratory tests to primary care, while treating a less economically favored population. Combined with positive results regarding quality, MH structures are a promising way to tackle the challenges of primary care.
Keywords
health care expenditures, socioeconomic characteristics, PHYSICIAN, FINANCIAL INCENTIVES, primary care, medical home

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 122.53 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Perelman, Julian, et al. “Medical Homes versus Individual Practice in Primary Care Impact on Health Care Expenditures.” MEDICAL CARE, vol. 51, no. 8, 2013, pp. 682–88, doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318293c2df.
APA
Perelman, J., Roch, I., Heymans, I., Moureaux, C., Lagasse, R., Annemans, L., & Closon, M.-C. (2013). Medical homes versus individual practice in primary care impact on health care expenditures. MEDICAL CARE, 51(8), 682–688. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e318293c2df
Chicago author-date
Perelman, Julian, Isabelle Roch, Isabelle Heymans, Catherine Moureaux, Raphael Lagasse, Lieven Annemans, and Marie-Christine Closon. 2013. “Medical Homes versus Individual Practice in Primary Care Impact on Health Care Expenditures.” MEDICAL CARE 51 (8): 682–88. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e318293c2df.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Perelman, Julian, Isabelle Roch, Isabelle Heymans, Catherine Moureaux, Raphael Lagasse, Lieven Annemans, and Marie-Christine Closon. 2013. “Medical Homes versus Individual Practice in Primary Care Impact on Health Care Expenditures.” MEDICAL CARE 51 (8): 682–688. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318293c2df.
Vancouver
1.
Perelman J, Roch I, Heymans I, Moureaux C, Lagasse R, Annemans L, et al. Medical homes versus individual practice in primary care impact on health care expenditures. MEDICAL CARE. 2013;51(8):682–8.
IEEE
[1]
J. Perelman et al., “Medical homes versus individual practice in primary care impact on health care expenditures,” MEDICAL CARE, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 682–688, 2013.
@article{4303678,
  abstract     = {{Background: The medical home (MH) model has prompted increasing attention given its potential to improve quality of care while reducing health expenditures.
Objectives: We compare overall and specific health care expenditures in Belgium, from the third-party payer perspective (compulsory social insurance), between patients treated at individual practices (IP) and at MHs. We compare the sociodemographic profile of MH and IP users.
Research Design: This is a retrospective study using public insurance claims data. Generalized linear models estimate the impact on health expenditures of being treated at a MH versus IP, controlling for individual, and area-based sociodemographic characteristics. The choice of primary care setting is modeled using logistic regressions.
Subjects: A random sample of 43,678 persons followed during the year 2004. 
Measures: Third-party payer expenditures for primary care, secondary care consultations, pharmaceuticals, laboratory tests, acute and long-term inpatient care.
Results: Overall third-party payer expenditures do not differ significantly between MH and IP users ((sic)+27). Third-party payer primary care expenditures are higher for MH than for IP users ((sic)+129), but this difference is offset by lower expenditures for secondary care consultations ((sic)-11), drugs ((sic)-40), laboratory tests ((sic)-5) and acute and long-term inpatient care ((sic)-53). MHs attract younger and more underprivileged populations.
Conclusions: MHs induce a shift in expenditures from secondary care, drugs, and laboratory tests to primary care, while treating a less economically favored population. Combined with positive results regarding quality, MH structures are a promising way to tackle the challenges of primary care.}},
  author       = {{Perelman, Julian and Roch, Isabelle and Heymans, Isabelle and Moureaux, Catherine and Lagasse, Raphael and Annemans, Lieven and Closon, Marie-Christine}},
  issn         = {{0025-7079}},
  journal      = {{MEDICAL CARE}},
  keywords     = {{health care expenditures,socioeconomic characteristics,PHYSICIAN,FINANCIAL INCENTIVES,primary care,medical home}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{8}},
  pages        = {{682--688}},
  title        = {{Medical homes versus individual practice in primary care impact on health care expenditures}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e318293c2df}},
  volume       = {{51}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: