Academic Bibliography

 Search 200 years of publications by Ghent University researchers.
Advanced search
Add to list
  1. Search results
  2. The double denial and the double bind...

The double denial and the double bind of psychologization: the Accoyer Amendment revisited.

Jan De Vos (UGent)
(2008) Psychoanalytic practice and state regulation. p.101-112
Author
Organization

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
De Vos, Jan. “The Double Denial and the Double Bind of Psychologization: The Accoyer Amendment Revisited.” Psychoanalytic Practice and State Regulation, Karnac, 2008, pp. 101–12.
APA
De Vos, J. (2008). The double denial and the double bind of psychologization: the Accoyer Amendment revisited. In Psychoanalytic practice and state regulation (pp. 101–112). Karnac.
Chicago author-date
De Vos, Jan. 2008. “The Double Denial and the Double Bind of Psychologization: The Accoyer Amendment Revisited.” In Psychoanalytic Practice and State Regulation, 101–12. Karnac.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
De Vos, Jan. 2008. “The Double Denial and the Double Bind of Psychologization: The Accoyer Amendment Revisited.” In Psychoanalytic Practice and State Regulation, 101–112. Karnac.
Vancouver
1.
De Vos J. The double denial and the double bind of psychologization: the Accoyer Amendment revisited. In: Psychoanalytic practice and state regulation. Karnac; 2008. p. 101–12.
IEEE
[1]
J. De Vos, “The double denial and the double bind of psychologization: the Accoyer Amendment revisited.,” in Psychoanalytic practice and state regulation, Karnac, 2008, pp. 101–112.
@incollection{428613,
  author       = {{De Vos, Jan}},
  booktitle    = {{Psychoanalytic practice and state regulation}},
  isbn         = {{9781855755338}},
  language     = {{und}},
  pages        = {{101--112}},
  publisher    = {{Karnac}},
  title        = {{The double denial and the double bind of psychologization: the Accoyer Amendment revisited.}},
  year         = {{2008}},
}