Advanced search

How to analyze policy-making networks: comparing the virtues and weaknesses of three methods: SNA, a qualitative case study method and a general structural method

(2011)
Author
Organization

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Vander Elst, Simon, and Diederik Vancoppenolle. 2011. “How to Analyze Policy-making Networks: Comparing the Virtues and Weaknesses of Three Methods: SNA, a Qualitative Case Study Method and a General Structural Method.” In .
APA
Vander Elst, S., & Vancoppenolle, D. (2011). How to analyze policy-making networks: comparing the virtues and weaknesses of three methods: SNA, a qualitative case study method and a general structural method.
Vancouver
1.
Vander Elst S, Vancoppenolle D. How to analyze policy-making networks: comparing the virtues and weaknesses of three methods: SNA, a qualitative case study method and a general structural method. 2011.
MLA
Vander Elst, Simon, and Diederik Vancoppenolle. “How to Analyze Policy-making Networks: Comparing the Virtues and Weaknesses of Three Methods: SNA, a Qualitative Case Study Method and a General Structural Method.” 2011. Print.
@inproceedings{4275071,
  author       = {Vander Elst, Simon and Vancoppenolle, Diederik},
  language     = {eng},
  title        = {How to analyze policy-making networks: comparing the virtues and weaknesses of three methods: SNA, a qualitative case study method and a general structural method},
  year         = {2011},
}