Advanced search
1 file | 1.01 MB

Revisions of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: lessons learned and improved outcome

Author
Organization
Abstract
This retrospective, consecutive case series of a single surgeon performed between 2001 and 2010 assesses the outcome following revision of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasties (N = 113). Mean time to revision was 31 months (0-101) after primary hip resurfacing. Malpositioning of the components with associated wear-induced soft tissue fluid collections was the most frequent factor leading to failure of a hip resurfacing arthroplasty. The mid-term outcome of the revisions was satisfactory; complications occurred in 11 patients (9.7%). Six of these patients underwent a re-revision.
Keywords
Outcome, Metal ions, Hip resurfacing, Revision hip arthroplasty

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 1.01 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
De Smet, Koen A, Catherine Van Der Straeten, Maarten Van Orsouw, Rachid Doubi, Katrien Backers, and George Grammatopoulos. 2011. “Revisions of Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing: Lessons Learned and Improved Outcome.” Orthopedic Clinics of North America 42 (2): 259–269.
APA
De Smet, K. A., Van Der Straeten, C., Van Orsouw, M., Doubi, R., Backers, K., & Grammatopoulos, G. (2011). Revisions of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: lessons learned and improved outcome. ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 42(2), 259–269.
Vancouver
1.
De Smet KA, Van Der Straeten C, Van Orsouw M, Doubi R, Backers K, Grammatopoulos G. Revisions of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: lessons learned and improved outcome. ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA. 2011;42(2):259–69.
MLA
De Smet, Koen A, Catherine Van Der Straeten, Maarten Van Orsouw, et al. “Revisions of Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing: Lessons Learned and Improved Outcome.” ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA 42.2 (2011): 259–269. Print.
@article{4265742,
  abstract     = {This retrospective, consecutive case series of a single surgeon performed between 2001 and 2010 assesses the outcome following revision of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasties (N = 113). Mean time to revision was 31 months (0-101) after primary hip resurfacing. Malpositioning of the components with associated wear-induced soft tissue fluid collections was the most frequent factor leading to failure of a hip resurfacing arthroplasty. The mid-term outcome of the revisions was satisfactory; complications occurred in 11 patients (9.7\%). Six of these patients underwent a re-revision.},
  author       = {De Smet, Koen A and Van Der Straeten, Catherine and Van Orsouw, Maarten and Doubi, Rachid and Backers, Katrien and Grammatopoulos, George},
  issn         = {0030-5898},
  journal      = {ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA},
  keyword      = {Outcome,Metal ions,Hip resurfacing,Revision hip arthroplasty},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {259--269},
  title        = {Revisions of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: lessons learned and improved outcome},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2011.01.003},
  volume       = {42},
  year         = {2011},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: