Do candidate reactions relate to job performance or affect criterion-related validity? A multistudy investigation of relations among reactions, selection test scores, and job performance
- Author
- Julie M McCarthy, Chad H Van Iddekinge, Filip Lievens (UGent) , Mei-Chuan Kung, Evan F Sinar and Michael A Campion
- Organization
- Abstract
- Considerable evidence suggests that how candidates react to selection procedures can affect their test performance and their attitudes toward the hiring organization (e.g., recommending the firm to others). However, very few studies of candidate reactions have examined one of the outcomes organizations care most about: job performance. We attempt to address this gap by developing and testing a conceptual framework that delineates whether and how candidate reactions might influence job performance. We accomplish this objective using data from 4 studies (total N = 6,480), 6 selection procedures (personality tests, job knowledge tests, cognitive ability tests, work samples, situational judgment tests, and a selection inventory), 5 key candidate reactions (anxiety, motivation, belief in tests, self-efficacy, and procedural justice), 2 contexts (industry and education), 3 continents (North America, South America, and Europe), 2 study designs (predictive and concurrent), and 4 occupational areas (medical, sales, customer service, and technological). Consistent with previous research, candidate reactions were related to test scores, and test scores were related to job performance. Further, there was some evidence that reactions affected performance indirectly through their influence on test scores. Finally, in no cases did candidate reactions affect the prediction of job performance by increasing or decreasing the criterion-related validity of test scores. Implications of these findings and avenues for future research are discussed.
- Keywords
- CORE SELF-EVALUATIONS, SITUATIONAL JUDGMENT TESTS, TEST BIAS, TEST ANXIETY, COGNITIVE-ABILITY TESTS, TEST-TAKING MOTIVATION, APPLICANT REACTIONS, MODERATED MULTIPLE-REGRESSION, INTEGRATING JUSTICE, PERSONNEL-SELECTION, candidate reactions, personnel selection, criterion-related validity, job performance
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 262.14 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-4209807
- MLA
- McCarthy, Julie M., et al. “Do Candidate Reactions Relate to Job Performance or Affect Criterion-Related Validity? A Multistudy Investigation of Relations among Reactions, Selection Test Scores, and Job Performance.” JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 98, no. 5, 2013, pp. 701–19, doi:10.1037/a0034089.
- APA
- McCarthy, J. M., Van Iddekinge, C. H., Lievens, F., Kung, M.-C., Sinar, E. F., & Campion, M. A. (2013). Do candidate reactions relate to job performance or affect criterion-related validity? A multistudy investigation of relations among reactions, selection test scores, and job performance. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 98(5), 701–719. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034089
- Chicago author-date
- McCarthy, Julie M, Chad H Van Iddekinge, Filip Lievens, Mei-Chuan Kung, Evan F Sinar, and Michael A Campion. 2013. “Do Candidate Reactions Relate to Job Performance or Affect Criterion-Related Validity? A Multistudy Investigation of Relations among Reactions, Selection Test Scores, and Job Performance.” JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY 98 (5): 701–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034089.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- McCarthy, Julie M, Chad H Van Iddekinge, Filip Lievens, Mei-Chuan Kung, Evan F Sinar, and Michael A Campion. 2013. “Do Candidate Reactions Relate to Job Performance or Affect Criterion-Related Validity? A Multistudy Investigation of Relations among Reactions, Selection Test Scores, and Job Performance.” JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY 98 (5): 701–719. doi:10.1037/a0034089.
- Vancouver
- 1.McCarthy JM, Van Iddekinge CH, Lievens F, Kung M-C, Sinar EF, Campion MA. Do candidate reactions relate to job performance or affect criterion-related validity? A multistudy investigation of relations among reactions, selection test scores, and job performance. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY. 2013;98(5):701–19.
- IEEE
- [1]J. M. McCarthy, C. H. Van Iddekinge, F. Lievens, M.-C. Kung, E. F. Sinar, and M. A. Campion, “Do candidate reactions relate to job performance or affect criterion-related validity? A multistudy investigation of relations among reactions, selection test scores, and job performance,” JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 701–719, 2013.
@article{4209807, abstract = {{Considerable evidence suggests that how candidates react to selection procedures can affect their test performance and their attitudes toward the hiring organization (e.g., recommending the firm to others). However, very few studies of candidate reactions have examined one of the outcomes organizations care most about: job performance. We attempt to address this gap by developing and testing a conceptual framework that delineates whether and how candidate reactions might influence job performance. We accomplish this objective using data from 4 studies (total N = 6,480), 6 selection procedures (personality tests, job knowledge tests, cognitive ability tests, work samples, situational judgment tests, and a selection inventory), 5 key candidate reactions (anxiety, motivation, belief in tests, self-efficacy, and procedural justice), 2 contexts (industry and education), 3 continents (North America, South America, and Europe), 2 study designs (predictive and concurrent), and 4 occupational areas (medical, sales, customer service, and technological). Consistent with previous research, candidate reactions were related to test scores, and test scores were related to job performance. Further, there was some evidence that reactions affected performance indirectly through their influence on test scores. Finally, in no cases did candidate reactions affect the prediction of job performance by increasing or decreasing the criterion-related validity of test scores. Implications of these findings and avenues for future research are discussed.}}, author = {{McCarthy, Julie M and Van Iddekinge, Chad H and Lievens, Filip and Kung, Mei-Chuan and Sinar, Evan F and Campion, Michael A}}, issn = {{0021-9010}}, journal = {{JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY}}, keywords = {{CORE SELF-EVALUATIONS,SITUATIONAL JUDGMENT TESTS,TEST BIAS,TEST ANXIETY,COGNITIVE-ABILITY TESTS,TEST-TAKING MOTIVATION,APPLICANT REACTIONS,MODERATED MULTIPLE-REGRESSION,INTEGRATING JUSTICE,PERSONNEL-SELECTION,candidate reactions,personnel selection,criterion-related validity,job performance}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{5}}, pages = {{701--719}}, title = {{Do candidate reactions relate to job performance or affect criterion-related validity? A multistudy investigation of relations among reactions, selection test scores, and job performance}}, url = {{http://doi.org/10.1037/a0034089}}, volume = {{98}}, year = {{2013}}, }
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: