Advanced search
1 file | 1.13 MB Add to list

Is biological treatment a viable alternative for micropollutant removal in drinking water treatment processes?

(2013) WATER RESEARCH. 47. p.5955-5976
Author
Organization
Keywords
Groundwater, Surface water, Pesticides, Pharmaceuticals, Biologically active sand filter, Bioaugmentation, Metabolic degradation, Xenobiotics, Co-metabolic transformation, SPHINGOMONAS-HERBICIDOVORANS MH, GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON, DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS, IN-GROUND WATER, BACTERIUM NITROSOMONAS-EUROPAEA, TRIAZINE-DEGRADING BACTERIA, MAJOR OXIDATION-PRODUCTS, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS, SP STRAIN SRS16, ESCHERICHIA-COLI

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 1.13 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Benner, Jessica, Damian E Helbling, Hans-Peter Kohler, et al. “Is Biological Treatment a Viable Alternative for Micropollutant Removal in Drinking Water Treatment Processes?” WATER RESEARCH 47 (2013): 5955–5976. Print.
APA
Benner, J., Helbling, D. E., Kohler, H.-P., Wittebol, J., Kaiser, E., Prasse, C., Ternes, T. A., et al. (2013). Is biological treatment a viable alternative for micropollutant removal in drinking water treatment processes? WATER RESEARCH, 47, 5955–5976.
Chicago author-date
Benner, Jessica, Damian E Helbling, Hans-Peter Kohler, Janneke Wittebol, Elena Kaiser, Carsten Prasse, Thomas A Ternes, et al. 2013. “Is Biological Treatment a Viable Alternative for Micropollutant Removal in Drinking Water Treatment Processes?” Water Research 47: 5955–5976.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Benner, Jessica, Damian E Helbling, Hans-Peter Kohler, Janneke Wittebol, Elena Kaiser, Carsten Prasse, Thomas A Ternes, Christian N Albers, Jens Aamand, Benjamin Horemans, Dirk Springael, Eddy Walravens, and Nico Boon. 2013. “Is Biological Treatment a Viable Alternative for Micropollutant Removal in Drinking Water Treatment Processes?” Water Research 47: 5955–5976.
Vancouver
1.
Benner J, Helbling DE, Kohler H-P, Wittebol J, Kaiser E, Prasse C, et al. Is biological treatment a viable alternative for micropollutant removal in drinking water treatment processes? WATER RESEARCH. 2013;47:5955–76.
IEEE
[1]
J. Benner et al., “Is biological treatment a viable alternative for micropollutant removal in drinking water treatment processes?,” WATER RESEARCH, vol. 47, pp. 5955–5976, 2013.
@article{4195216,
  author       = {Benner, Jessica and Helbling, Damian E and Kohler, Hans-Peter and Wittebol, Janneke and Kaiser, Elena and Prasse, Carsten and Ternes, Thomas A and Albers, Christian N and Aamand, Jens and Horemans, Benjamin and Springael, Dirk and Walravens, Eddy and Boon, Nico},
  issn         = {0043-1354},
  journal      = {WATER RESEARCH},
  keywords     = {Groundwater,Surface water,Pesticides,Pharmaceuticals,Biologically active sand filter,Bioaugmentation,Metabolic degradation,Xenobiotics,Co-metabolic transformation,SPHINGOMONAS-HERBICIDOVORANS MH,GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON,DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS,IN-GROUND WATER,BACTERIUM NITROSOMONAS-EUROPAEA,TRIAZINE-DEGRADING BACTERIA,MAJOR OXIDATION-PRODUCTS,PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS,SP STRAIN SRS16,ESCHERICHIA-COLI},
  language     = {eng},
  pages        = {5955--5976},
  title        = {Is biological treatment a viable alternative for micropollutant removal in drinking water treatment processes?},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.015},
  volume       = {47},
  year         = {2013},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: