Advanced search
1 file | 144.15 KB Add to list

Being in or getting at the real: Kochan on Rouse, Heidegger and minimal realism

(2013) PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE. 21(4). p.453-462
Author
Organization
Abstract
We discuss Kochan's recent criticism of the work of Joseph Rouse (Kochan 2011). We argue that Kochan fails to show that both Rouse's own work and his Heidegger interpretation are plagued by insurmountable problems. We also try to locate the deeper, meta-philosophical reasons that are responsible for what we take to be Kochan's misreading of Rouse's work. This allows us to throw some light on the standoff that so often seems to characterize debates on scientific realism.
Keywords
Heidegger, Scientific Realism, Rouse

Downloads

  • Kochan-Rouse-def.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 144.15 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Anna, De Bruyckere, and Maarten Van Dyck. “Being in or Getting at the Real: Kochan on Rouse, Heidegger and Minimal Realism.” PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE 21.4 (2013): 453–462. Print.
APA
Anna, D. B., & Van Dyck, M. (2013). Being in or getting at the real: Kochan on Rouse, Heidegger and minimal realism. PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE, 21(4), 453–462.
Chicago author-date
Anna, De Bruyckere, and Maarten Van Dyck. 2013. “Being in or Getting at the Real: Kochan on Rouse, Heidegger and Minimal Realism.” Perspectives on Science 21 (4): 453–462.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Anna, De Bruyckere, and Maarten Van Dyck. 2013. “Being in or Getting at the Real: Kochan on Rouse, Heidegger and Minimal Realism.” Perspectives on Science 21 (4): 453–462.
Vancouver
1.
Anna DB, Van Dyck M. Being in or getting at the real: Kochan on Rouse, Heidegger and minimal realism. PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE. 2013;21(4):453–62.
IEEE
[1]
D. B. Anna and M. Van Dyck, “Being in or getting at the real: Kochan on Rouse, Heidegger and minimal realism,” PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 453–462, 2013.
@article{4190579,
  abstract     = {We discuss Kochan's recent criticism of the work of Joseph Rouse (Kochan 2011). We argue that Kochan fails to show that both Rouse's own work and his Heidegger interpretation are plagued by insurmountable problems. We also try to locate the deeper, meta-philosophical reasons that are responsible for what we take to be Kochan's misreading of Rouse's work. This allows us to throw some light on the standoff that so often seems to characterize debates on scientific realism.},
  author       = {Anna, De Bruyckere and Van Dyck, Maarten},
  issn         = {1063-6145},
  journal      = {PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE},
  keywords     = {Heidegger,Scientific Realism,Rouse},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {4},
  pages        = {453--462},
  title        = {Being in or getting at the real: Kochan on Rouse, Heidegger and minimal realism},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/POSC_a_00112},
  volume       = {21},
  year         = {2013},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric