Advanced search
1 file | 105.86 KB Add to list

Understanding relations between science, politics, and the public: the case of a GM field trial controversy in Belgium

(2014) SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS. 54(1). p.21-39
Author
Organization
Abstract
In 2011, a Belgian field trial with genetically modified crops triggered fierce public protests and debates. Opponents of the trial protested against its performance and some advocated its destruction, in response to which scientists and the government defended a scientific freedom to perform the trial. This article investigates why the different stakeholders came to occupy such mutually exclusive positions towards the trial. Based on analyses of qualitative interviews with key stakeholders, document analyses, and field observations, the article argues that the different stakeholders were involved in an ontological politics. This politics centred on the question of which ontologically different, co-existing versions of the trial should be attended to in institutionalised scientific and political appraisals of the trial. The article concludes that the institutional handling of the trial as if it represented a single reality that merited only epistemological struggles contributed to turning a multifaceted debate into a dichotomous one, figuring field trial proponents and opponents. As such, the opposition between the different stakeholders was not antecedent to the institutional handling of the trial – as different stakeholders claimed – but rather an outcome of it.
Keywords
science and the public, GM crops, ontological politics, controversy, Food policy, GOVERNANCE

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 105.86 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
De Krom, Michiel, Joost Dessein, and Nathalie Erbout. “Understanding Relations Between Science, Politics, and the Public: The Case of a GM Field Trial Controversy in Belgium.” SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS 54.1 (2014): 21–39. Print.
APA
De Krom, M., Dessein, J., & Erbout, N. (2014). Understanding relations between science, politics, and the public: the case of a GM field trial controversy in Belgium. SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 54(1), 21–39.
Chicago author-date
De Krom, Michiel, Joost Dessein, and Nathalie Erbout. 2014. “Understanding Relations Between Science, Politics, and the Public: The Case of a GM Field Trial Controversy in Belgium.” Sociologia Ruralis 54 (1): 21–39.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
De Krom, Michiel, Joost Dessein, and Nathalie Erbout. 2014. “Understanding Relations Between Science, Politics, and the Public: The Case of a GM Field Trial Controversy in Belgium.” Sociologia Ruralis 54 (1): 21–39.
Vancouver
1.
De Krom M, Dessein J, Erbout N. Understanding relations between science, politics, and the public: the case of a GM field trial controversy in Belgium. SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS. 2014;54(1):21–39.
IEEE
[1]
M. De Krom, J. Dessein, and N. Erbout, “Understanding relations between science, politics, and the public: the case of a GM field trial controversy in Belgium,” SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 21–39, 2014.
@article{4182260,
  abstract     = {In 2011, a Belgian field trial with genetically modified crops triggered fierce public protests and debates. Opponents of the trial protested against its performance and some advocated its destruction, in response to which scientists and the government defended a scientific freedom to perform the trial. This article investigates why the different stakeholders came to occupy such mutually exclusive positions towards the trial. Based on analyses of qualitative interviews with key stakeholders, document analyses, and field observations, the article argues that the different stakeholders were involved in an ontological politics. This politics centred on the question of which ontologically different, co-existing versions of the trial should be attended to in institutionalised scientific and political appraisals of the trial. The article concludes that the institutional handling of the trial as if it represented a single reality that merited only epistemological struggles contributed to turning a multifaceted debate into a dichotomous one, figuring field trial proponents and opponents. As such, the opposition between the different stakeholders was not antecedent to the institutional handling of the trial – as different stakeholders claimed – but rather an outcome of it.},
  author       = {De Krom, Michiel and Dessein, Joost and Erbout, Nathalie},
  issn         = {0038-0199},
  journal      = {SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS},
  keywords     = {science and the public,GM crops,ontological politics,controversy,Food policy,GOVERNANCE},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {21--39},
  title        = {Understanding relations between science, politics, and the public: the case of a GM field trial controversy in Belgium},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/soru.12031},
  volume       = {54},
  year         = {2014},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: