Advanced search
Add to list

Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation

(2008) PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY. 84(2). p.132-147
Author
Organization

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
KADOSH, RC, Jan Lammertyn, and V IZARD. “Are Numbers Special? An Overview of Chronometric, Neuroimaging, Developmental and Comparative Studies of Magnitude Representation.” PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY 84.2 (2008): 132–147. Print.
APA
KADOSH, R., Lammertyn, J., & IZARD, V. (2008). Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation. PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 84(2), 132–147.
Chicago author-date
KADOSH, RC, Jan Lammertyn, and V IZARD. 2008. “Are Numbers Special? An Overview of Chronometric, Neuroimaging, Developmental and Comparative Studies of Magnitude Representation.” Progress in Neurobiology 84 (2): 132–147.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
KADOSH, RC, Jan Lammertyn, and V IZARD. 2008. “Are Numbers Special? An Overview of Chronometric, Neuroimaging, Developmental and Comparative Studies of Magnitude Representation.” Progress in Neurobiology 84 (2): 132–147.
Vancouver
1.
KADOSH R, Lammertyn J, IZARD V. Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation. PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY. 2008;84(2):132–47.
IEEE
[1]
R. KADOSH, J. Lammertyn, and V. IZARD, “Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation,” PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 132–147, 2008.
@article{418024,
  author       = {{KADOSH, RC and Lammertyn, Jan and IZARD, V}},
  issn         = {{0301-0082}},
  journal      = {{PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{132--147}},
  title        = {{Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation}},
  volume       = {{84}},
  year         = {{2008}},
}

Web of Science
Times cited: