A delta-rule model of numerical and non-numerical order processing
- Author
- Tom Verguts (UGent) and Filip Van Opstal (UGent)
- Organization
- Project
- The integrative neuroscience of behavioral control (Neuroscience)
- Abstract
- Numerical and non-numerical order processing share empirical characteristics (distance effect and semantic congruity), but there are also important differences (in size effect and end effect). At the same time, models and theories of numerical and non-numerical order processing developed largely separately. Currently, we combine insights from 2 earlier models to integrate them in a common framework. We argue that the same learning principle underlies numerical and non-numerical orders, but that environmental features determine the empirical differences. Implications for current theories on order processing are pointed out.
- Keywords
- computational modeling, learning, non-numerical orders, numerical cognition, BRAIN, MAGNITUDE, NEURAL MODEL, DIGIT NUMBERS, WORKING-MEMORY, PARIETAL CORTEX, DECISION-MAKING, TRANSITIVE INFERENCE, COMPARATIVE JUDGMENTS, NUMBER REPRESENTATION
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 643.94 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-4166111
- MLA
- Verguts, Tom, and Filip Van Opstal. “A Delta-rule Model of Numerical and Non-numerical Order Processing.” JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY: HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE 40.3 (2014): 1092–1102. Print.
- APA
- Verguts, Tom, & Van Opstal, F. (2014). A delta-rule model of numerical and non-numerical order processing. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY: HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 40(3), 1092–1102.
- Chicago author-date
- Verguts, Tom, and Filip Van Opstal. 2014. “A Delta-rule Model of Numerical and Non-numerical Order Processing.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 40 (3): 1092–1102.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Verguts, Tom, and Filip Van Opstal. 2014. “A Delta-rule Model of Numerical and Non-numerical Order Processing.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 40 (3): 1092–1102.
- Vancouver
- 1.Verguts T, Van Opstal F. A delta-rule model of numerical and non-numerical order processing. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY: HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE. 2014;40(3):1092–102.
- IEEE
- [1]T. Verguts and F. Van Opstal, “A delta-rule model of numerical and non-numerical order processing,” JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY: HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 1092–1102, 2014.
@article{4166111,
abstract = {Numerical and non-numerical order processing share empirical characteristics (distance effect and semantic congruity), but there are also important differences (in size effect and end effect). At the same time, models and theories of numerical and non-numerical order processing developed largely separately. Currently, we combine insights from 2 earlier models to integrate them in a common framework. We argue that the same learning principle underlies numerical and non-numerical orders, but that environmental features determine the empirical differences. Implications for current theories on order processing are pointed out.},
author = {Verguts, Tom and Van Opstal, Filip},
issn = {0096-1523},
journal = {JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY: HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE},
keywords = {computational modeling,learning,non-numerical orders,numerical cognition,BRAIN,MAGNITUDE,NEURAL MODEL,DIGIT NUMBERS,WORKING-MEMORY,PARIETAL CORTEX,DECISION-MAKING,TRANSITIVE INFERENCE,COMPARATIVE JUDGMENTS,NUMBER REPRESENTATION},
language = {eng},
number = {3},
pages = {1092--1102},
title = {A delta-rule model of numerical and non-numerical order processing},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035114},
volume = {40},
year = {2014},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: