Advanced search
1 file | 643.94 KB Add to list

A delta-rule model of numerical and non-numerical order processing

Tom Verguts (UGent) and Filip Van Opstal (UGent)
Author
Organization
Project
The integrative neuroscience of behavioral control (Neuroscience)
Abstract
Numerical and non-numerical order processing share empirical characteristics (distance effect and semantic congruity), but there are also important differences (in size effect and end effect). At the same time, models and theories of numerical and non-numerical order processing developed largely separately. Currently, we combine insights from 2 earlier models to integrate them in a common framework. We argue that the same learning principle underlies numerical and non-numerical orders, but that environmental features determine the empirical differences. Implications for current theories on order processing are pointed out.
Keywords
computational modeling, learning, non-numerical orders, numerical cognition, BRAIN, MAGNITUDE, NEURAL MODEL, DIGIT NUMBERS, WORKING-MEMORY, PARIETAL CORTEX, DECISION-MAKING, TRANSITIVE INFERENCE, COMPARATIVE JUDGMENTS, NUMBER REPRESENTATION

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 643.94 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Verguts, Tom, and Filip Van Opstal. “A Delta-rule Model of Numerical and Non-numerical Order Processing.” JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY: HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE 40.3 (2014): 1092–1102. Print.
APA
Verguts, Tom, & Van Opstal, F. (2014). A delta-rule model of numerical and non-numerical order processing. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY: HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 40(3), 1092–1102.
Chicago author-date
Verguts, Tom, and Filip Van Opstal. 2014. “A Delta-rule Model of Numerical and Non-numerical Order Processing.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 40 (3): 1092–1102.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Verguts, Tom, and Filip Van Opstal. 2014. “A Delta-rule Model of Numerical and Non-numerical Order Processing.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 40 (3): 1092–1102.
Vancouver
1.
Verguts T, Van Opstal F. A delta-rule model of numerical and non-numerical order processing. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY: HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE. 2014;40(3):1092–102.
IEEE
[1]
T. Verguts and F. Van Opstal, “A delta-rule model of numerical and non-numerical order processing,” JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY: HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 1092–1102, 2014.
@article{4166111,
  abstract     = {Numerical and non-numerical order processing share empirical characteristics (distance effect and semantic congruity), but there are also important differences (in size effect and end effect). At the same time, models and theories of numerical and non-numerical order processing developed largely separately. Currently, we combine insights from 2 earlier models to integrate them in a common framework. We argue that the same learning principle underlies numerical and non-numerical orders, but that environmental features determine the empirical differences. Implications for current theories on order processing are pointed out.},
  author       = {Verguts, Tom and Van Opstal, Filip},
  issn         = {0096-1523},
  journal      = {JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY: HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE},
  keywords     = {computational modeling,learning,non-numerical orders,numerical cognition,BRAIN,MAGNITUDE,NEURAL MODEL,DIGIT NUMBERS,WORKING-MEMORY,PARIETAL CORTEX,DECISION-MAKING,TRANSITIVE INFERENCE,COMPARATIVE JUDGMENTS,NUMBER REPRESENTATION},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {3},
  pages        = {1092--1102},
  title        = {A delta-rule model of numerical and non-numerical order processing},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035114},
  volume       = {40},
  year         = {2014},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: