Advanced search

Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector vs screen-film and storage phosphor systems in chest imaging: Comparison of the entrance skin dose

Peter Smeets (UGent) , Klaus Bacher (UGent) , Philippe Duyck (UGent) , Koenraad Verstraete (UGent) and Hubert Thierens (UGent)
(2002) RADIOLOGY. 225. p.382-382
Author
Organization

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Smeets, Peter, Klaus Bacher, Philippe Duyck, Koenraad Verstraete, and Hubert Thierens. 2002. “Digital Amorphous Silicon Flat-panel Detector Vs Screen-film and Storage Phosphor Systems in Chest Imaging: Comparison of the Entrance Skin Dose.” In Radiology, 225:382–382. RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA.
APA
Smeets, P., Bacher, K., Duyck, P., Verstraete, K., & Thierens, H. (2002). Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector vs screen-film and storage phosphor systems in chest imaging: Comparison of the entrance skin dose. RADIOLOGY (Vol. 225, pp. 382–382). RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA.
Vancouver
1.
Smeets P, Bacher K, Duyck P, Verstraete K, Thierens H. Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector vs screen-film and storage phosphor systems in chest imaging: Comparison of the entrance skin dose. RADIOLOGY. RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA; 2002. p. 382–382.
MLA
Smeets, Peter, Klaus Bacher, Philippe Duyck, et al. “Digital Amorphous Silicon Flat-panel Detector Vs Screen-film and Storage Phosphor Systems in Chest Imaging: Comparison of the Entrance Skin Dose.” Radiology. Vol. 225. RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA, 2002. 382–382. Print.
@inproceedings{412526,
  author       = {Smeets, Peter and Bacher, Klaus and Duyck, Philippe and Verstraete, Koenraad and Thierens, Hubert},
  booktitle    = {RADIOLOGY},
  issn         = {0033-8419},
  language     = {eng},
  pages        = {382--382},
  publisher    = {RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA},
  title        = {Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector vs screen-film and storage phosphor systems in chest imaging: Comparison of the entrance skin dose},
  volume       = {225},
  year         = {2002},
}

Web of Science
Times cited: