Advanced search
1 file | 1.36 MB Add to list

The (neuro)cognitive mechanisms behind attention bias modification in anxiety: proposals based on theoretical accounts of attentional bias

Author
Organization
Abstract
Recently, researchers have investigated the causal nature of attentional bias for threat (AB) in the maintenance of anxiety disorders by experimentally manipulating it. They found that training anxious individuals to attend to non-threat stimuli reduces AB, which, in turn, reduces anxiety. This effect supports the hypothesis that AB can causally impact the maintenance of anxiety. At a fundamental level, however, uncertainty still abounds regarding the nature of the processes that mediate this effect. In the present paper, we propose that two contrasting approaches may be derived from theoretical accounts of AB. According to a first class of models, called the "valence-specific bias" models, modifying AB requires the modification of valence-specific attentional selectivity. According to a second class of models, called the "attention control models," modifying AB requires the modification of attention control, driven by the recruitment of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. We formulate a series of specific predictions, to provide suggestions to trial these two approaches one against the other. This knowledge is critical for understanding the mechanisms of AB in anxiety disorders, which bares important clinical implications.
Keywords
GENERALIZED SOCIAL PHOBIA, INFORMATION-PROCESSING MODEL, DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX, TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION, EMOTIONAL INFORMATION, SELECTIVE ATTENTION, WORKING-MEMORY, THREAT, AMYGDALA, TASK, attentional bias, cognitive bias modification, experimental psychopathology, neuromodulation, DLPFC

Downloads

  • Heeren DeRaedt2013 FHN.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 1.36 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Heeren, Alexandre, et al. “The (Neuro)Cognitive Mechanisms behind Attention Bias Modification in Anxiety: Proposals Based on Theoretical Accounts of Attentional Bias.” FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, vol. 7, 2013, doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00119.
APA
Heeren, A., De Raedt, R., Koster, E., & Philippot, P. (2013). The (neuro)cognitive mechanisms behind attention bias modification in anxiety: proposals based on theoretical accounts of attentional bias. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00119
Chicago author-date
Heeren, Alexandre, Rudi De Raedt, Ernst Koster, and Pierre Philippot. 2013. “The (Neuro)Cognitive Mechanisms behind Attention Bias Modification in Anxiety: Proposals Based on Theoretical Accounts of Attentional Bias.” FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00119.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Heeren, Alexandre, Rudi De Raedt, Ernst Koster, and Pierre Philippot. 2013. “The (Neuro)Cognitive Mechanisms behind Attention Bias Modification in Anxiety: Proposals Based on Theoretical Accounts of Attentional Bias.” FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE 7. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00119.
Vancouver
1.
Heeren A, De Raedt R, Koster E, Philippot P. The (neuro)cognitive mechanisms behind attention bias modification in anxiety: proposals based on theoretical accounts of attentional bias. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE. 2013;7.
IEEE
[1]
A. Heeren, R. De Raedt, E. Koster, and P. Philippot, “The (neuro)cognitive mechanisms behind attention bias modification in anxiety: proposals based on theoretical accounts of attentional bias,” FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, vol. 7, 2013.
@article{4089506,
  abstract     = {{Recently, researchers have investigated the causal nature of attentional bias for threat (AB) in the maintenance of anxiety disorders by experimentally manipulating it. They found that training anxious individuals to attend to non-threat stimuli reduces AB, which, in turn, reduces anxiety. This effect supports the hypothesis that AB can causally impact the maintenance of anxiety. At a fundamental level, however, uncertainty still abounds regarding the nature of the processes that mediate this effect. In the present paper, we propose that two contrasting approaches may be derived from theoretical accounts of AB. According to a first class of models, called the "valence-specific bias" models, modifying AB requires the modification of valence-specific attentional selectivity. According to a second class of models, called the "attention control models," modifying AB requires the modification of attention control, driven by the recruitment of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. We formulate a series of specific predictions, to provide suggestions to trial these two approaches one against the other. This knowledge is critical for understanding the mechanisms of AB in anxiety disorders, which bares important clinical implications.}},
  articleno    = {{119}},
  author       = {{Heeren, Alexandre and De Raedt, Rudi and Koster, Ernst and Philippot, Pierre}},
  issn         = {{1662-5161}},
  journal      = {{FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE}},
  keywords     = {{GENERALIZED SOCIAL PHOBIA,INFORMATION-PROCESSING MODEL,DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX,TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION,EMOTIONAL INFORMATION,SELECTIVE ATTENTION,WORKING-MEMORY,THREAT,AMYGDALA,TASK,attentional bias,cognitive bias modification,experimental psychopathology,neuromodulation,DLPFC}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{6}},
  title        = {{The (neuro)cognitive mechanisms behind attention bias modification in anxiety: proposals based on theoretical accounts of attentional bias}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00119}},
  volume       = {{7}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: