A comparison of human and automatic musical genre classification
- Author
- Stefaan Lippens (UGent) , Jean-Pierre Martens (UGent) , Tom De Mulder and G Tzanetakis
- Organization
- Abstract
- Recently there has been an increasing amount of work in the area of automatic genre classification of music in audio format. In addition to automatically structuring large music collections such classification can be used as a way to evaluate features for describing musical content. However the evaluation and comparison of genre classification systems is hindered by the subjective perception of genre definitions by users. In this work we describe a set of experiments in automatic musical genre classification. An important contribution of this work is the comparison of the automatic results with human genre classifications on the same dataset. The results show that, although there is room for improvement, genre classification is inherently subjective and therefore perfect results can not be expected neither from automatic nor human classification. The experiments also show that features derived from an auditory model have similar performance with features based on Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC).
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-404062
- MLA
- Lippens, Stefaan, et al. “A Comparison of Human and Automatic Musical Genre Classification.” 2004 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL IV, PROCEEDINGS, IEEE, 2004, pp. 233–36, doi:10.1109/ICASSP.2004.1326806.
- APA
- Lippens, S., Martens, J.-P., De Mulder, T., & Tzanetakis, G. (2004). A comparison of human and automatic musical genre classification. 2004 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL IV, PROCEEDINGS, 233–236. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2004.1326806
- Chicago author-date
- Lippens, Stefaan, Jean-Pierre Martens, Tom De Mulder, and G Tzanetakis. 2004. “A Comparison of Human and Automatic Musical Genre Classification.” In 2004 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL IV, PROCEEDINGS, 233–36. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2004.1326806.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Lippens, Stefaan, Jean-Pierre Martens, Tom De Mulder, and G Tzanetakis. 2004. “A Comparison of Human and Automatic Musical Genre Classification.” In 2004 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL IV, PROCEEDINGS, 233–236. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICASSP.2004.1326806.
- Vancouver
- 1.Lippens S, Martens J-P, De Mulder T, Tzanetakis G. A comparison of human and automatic musical genre classification. In: 2004 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL IV, PROCEEDINGS. New York, NY, USA: IEEE; 2004. p. 233–6.
- IEEE
- [1]S. Lippens, J.-P. Martens, T. De Mulder, and G. Tzanetakis, “A comparison of human and automatic musical genre classification,” in 2004 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL IV, PROCEEDINGS, Montréal, QU, Canada, 2004, pp. 233–236.
@inproceedings{404062,
abstract = {{Recently there has been an increasing amount of work in the area of automatic genre classification of music in audio format. In addition to automatically structuring large music collections such classification can be used as a way to evaluate features for describing musical content. However the evaluation and comparison of genre classification systems is hindered by the subjective perception of genre definitions by users. In this work we describe a set of experiments in automatic musical genre classification. An important contribution of this work is the comparison of the automatic results with human genre classifications on the same dataset. The results show that, although there is room for improvement, genre classification is inherently subjective and therefore perfect results can not be expected neither from automatic nor human classification. The experiments also show that features derived from an auditory model have similar performance with features based on Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC).}},
author = {{Lippens, Stefaan and Martens, Jean-Pierre and De Mulder, Tom and Tzanetakis, G}},
booktitle = {{2004 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL IV, PROCEEDINGS}},
isbn = {{0-7803-8484-9}},
issn = {{1520-6149}},
language = {{eng}},
location = {{Montréal, QU, Canada}},
pages = {{233--236}},
publisher = {{IEEE}},
title = {{A comparison of human and automatic musical genre classification}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2004.1326806}},
year = {{2004}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: