Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Daytime depression in tree stem CO2 efflux rates: Is it caused by low stem turgor pressure?

An Saveyn UGent, Kathy Steppe UGent and Raoul Lemeur UGent (2007) ANNALS OF BOTANY. 99(3). p.477-485
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle
publication status
published
subject
journal title
ANNALS OF BOTANY
Ann. Bot.
volume
99
issue
3
pages
477-485 pages
publisher
Oxford University Press
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000245176800007
JCR category
PLANT SCIENCES
JCR impact factor
2.939 (2007)
JCR rank
22/149 (2007)
JCR quartile
1 (2007)
ISSN
0305-7364
DOI
1854/8238
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
id
377225
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-377225
date created
2007-09-25 14:53:00
date last changed
2008-02-22 23:01:49
@article{377225,
  author       = {Saveyn, An and Steppe, Kathy and Lemeur, Raoul},
  issn         = {0305-7364},
  journal      = {ANNALS OF BOTANY},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {3},
  pages        = {477--485},
  publisher    = {Oxford University Press},
  title        = {Daytime depression in tree stem CO2 efflux rates: Is it caused by low stem turgor pressure?},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/1854/8238},
  volume       = {99},
  year         = {2007},
}

Chicago
Saveyn, An, Kathy Steppe, and Raoul Lemeur. 2007. “Daytime Depression in Tree Stem CO2 Efflux Rates: Is It Caused by Low Stem Turgor Pressure?” Annals of Botany 99 (3): 477–485.
APA
Saveyn, A., Steppe, K., & Lemeur, R. (2007). Daytime depression in tree stem CO2 efflux rates: Is it caused by low stem turgor pressure? ANNALS OF BOTANY, 99(3), 477–485.
Vancouver
1.
Saveyn A, Steppe K, Lemeur R. Daytime depression in tree stem CO2 efflux rates: Is it caused by low stem turgor pressure? ANNALS OF BOTANY. Oxford University Press; 2007;99(3):477–85.
MLA
Saveyn, An, Kathy Steppe, and Raoul Lemeur. “Daytime Depression in Tree Stem CO2 Efflux Rates: Is It Caused by Low Stem Turgor Pressure?” ANNALS OF BOTANY 99.3 (2007): 477–485. Print.