Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Acceptance of sticks, carrots and sermons as policy instruments for directing private forest management

Inge Serbruyns and Sebastiaan Luyssaert (2006) FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS. 9(3). p.285-296
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle
publication status
published
subject
journal title
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS
Forest Policy Econ.
volume
9
issue
3
pages
285-296 pages
publisher
Elsevier Science
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000242665000008
JCR category
FORESTRY
JCR impact factor
0.907 (2006)
JCR rank
15/35 (2006)
JCR quartile
2 (2006)
ISSN
1389-9341
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
id
372409
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-372409
date created
2007-07-05 14:59:00
date last changed
2008-05-15 20:57:30
@article{372409,
  author       = {Serbruyns, Inge and Luyssaert, Sebastiaan},
  issn         = {1389-9341},
  journal      = {FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {3},
  pages        = {285--296},
  publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
  title        = {Acceptance of sticks, carrots and sermons as policy instruments for directing private forest management},
  volume       = {9},
  year         = {2006},
}

Chicago
Serbruyns, Inge, and Sebastiaan Luyssaert. 2006. “Acceptance of Sticks, Carrots and Sermons as Policy Instruments for Directing Private Forest Management.” Forest Policy and Economics 9 (3): 285–296.
APA
Serbruyns, I., & Luyssaert, S. (2006). Acceptance of sticks, carrots and sermons as policy instruments for directing private forest management. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 9(3), 285–296.
Vancouver
1.
Serbruyns I, Luyssaert S. Acceptance of sticks, carrots and sermons as policy instruments for directing private forest management. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS. Elsevier Science; 2006;9(3):285–96.
MLA
Serbruyns, Inge, and Sebastiaan Luyssaert. “Acceptance of Sticks, Carrots and Sermons as Policy Instruments for Directing Private Forest Management.” FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS 9.3 (2006): 285–296. Print.