Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

An analysis of differences in work motivation between public and private sector organizations

Marc Buelens UGent and Herman Van Den Broeck UGent (2007) PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW. 67(1). p.65-74
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle
publication status
published
subject
journal title
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW
Public Adm. Rev.
volume
67
issue
1
pages
65-74 pages
publisher
BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000243841500007
JCR category
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
JCR impact factor
1.321 (2007)
JCR rank
3/25 (2007)
JCR quartile
1 (2007)
ISSN
0033-3352
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
id
372369
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-372369
date created
2007-07-05 12:56:00
date last changed
2015-01-22 10:16:17
@article{372369,
  author       = {Buelens, Marc and Van Den Broeck, Herman},
  issn         = {0033-3352},
  journal      = {PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {65--74},
  publisher    = {BLACKWELL PUBLISHING},
  title        = {An analysis of differences in work motivation between public and private sector organizations},
  volume       = {67},
  year         = {2007},
}

Chicago
Buelens, Marc, and Herman Van Den Broeck. 2007. “An Analysis of Differences in Work Motivation Between Public and Private Sector Organizations.” Public Administration Review 67 (1): 65–74.
APA
Buelens, M., & Van Den Broeck, H. (2007). An analysis of differences in work motivation between public and private sector organizations. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 67(1), 65–74.
Vancouver
1.
Buelens M, Van Den Broeck H. An analysis of differences in work motivation between public and private sector organizations. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW. BLACKWELL PUBLISHING; 2007;67(1):65–74.
MLA
Buelens, Marc, and Herman Van Den Broeck. “An Analysis of Differences in Work Motivation Between Public and Private Sector Organizations.” PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW 67.1 (2007): 65–74. Print.