Optical versus Mechanical Models: Newton's "Failure" to Construct an Optical Theory
- Author
- Steffen Ducheyne (UGent)
- Organization
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-345102
- MLA
- Ducheyne, Steffen. “Optical versus Mechanical Models: Newton’s ‘Failure’ to Construct an Optical Theory.” LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE, vol. 49, no. 194, 2006, pp. 199–223.
- APA
- Ducheyne, S. (2006). Optical versus Mechanical Models: Newton’s “Failure” to Construct an Optical Theory. LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE, 49(194), 199–223.
- Chicago author-date
- Ducheyne, Steffen. 2006. “Optical versus Mechanical Models: Newton’s ‘Failure’ to Construct an Optical Theory.” LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE 49 (194): 199–223.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Ducheyne, Steffen. 2006. “Optical versus Mechanical Models: Newton’s ‘Failure’ to Construct an Optical Theory.” LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE 49 (194): 199–223.
- Vancouver
- 1.Ducheyne S. Optical versus Mechanical Models: Newton’s “Failure” to Construct an Optical Theory. LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE. 2006;49(194):199–223.
- IEEE
- [1]S. Ducheyne, “Optical versus Mechanical Models: Newton’s ‘Failure’ to Construct an Optical Theory,” LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE, vol. 49, no. 194, pp. 199–223, 2006.
@article{345102,
author = {{Ducheyne, Steffen}},
issn = {{0024-5836}},
journal = {{LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE}},
language = {{und}},
number = {{194}},
pages = {{199--223}},
title = {{Optical versus Mechanical Models: Newton's "Failure" to Construct an Optical Theory}},
volume = {{49}},
year = {{2006}},
}