Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Does the commonly used estimator of nutrient resorption in tree foliage actually measure what it claims to?

S LUYSSAERT, Jeroen Staelens UGent and An De Schrijver UGent (2005) OECOLOGIA. 144(2). p.177-186
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle
publication status
published
subject
journal title
OECOLOGIA
Oecologia
volume
144
issue
2
pages
177-186 pages
publisher
Springer
Web of Science type
Review
Web of Science id
000230459800001
JCR category
ECOLOGY
JCR impact factor
3.032 (2005)
JCR rank
24/110 (2005)
JCR quartile
1 (2005)
ISSN
0029-8549
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
id
341272
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-341272
date created
2006-06-20 14:09:00
date last changed
2008-02-22 22:59:02
@article{341272,
  author       = {LUYSSAERT, S and Staelens, Jeroen and De Schrijver, An},
  issn         = {0029-8549},
  journal      = {OECOLOGIA},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {177--186},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  title        = {Does the commonly used estimator of nutrient resorption in tree foliage actually measure what it claims to?},
  volume       = {144},
  year         = {2005},
}

Chicago
LUYSSAERT, S, Jeroen Staelens, and An De Schrijver. 2005. “Does the Commonly Used Estimator of Nutrient Resorption in Tree Foliage Actually Measure What It Claims To?” Oecologia 144 (2): 177–186.
APA
LUYSSAERT, S., Staelens, J., & De Schrijver, A. (2005). Does the commonly used estimator of nutrient resorption in tree foliage actually measure what it claims to? OECOLOGIA, 144(2), 177–186.
Vancouver
1.
LUYSSAERT S, Staelens J, De Schrijver A. Does the commonly used estimator of nutrient resorption in tree foliage actually measure what it claims to? OECOLOGIA. Springer; 2005;144(2):177–86.
MLA
LUYSSAERT, S, Jeroen Staelens, and An De Schrijver. “Does the Commonly Used Estimator of Nutrient Resorption in Tree Foliage Actually Measure What It Claims To?” OECOLOGIA 144.2 (2005): 177–186. Print.