Advanced search

Does the commonly used estimator of nutrient resorption in tree foliage actually measure what it claims to?

(2005) OECOLOGIA. 144(2). p.177-186
Author
Organization

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
LUYSSAERT, S, Jeroen Staelens, and An De Schrijver. 2005. “Does the Commonly Used Estimator of Nutrient Resorption in Tree Foliage Actually Measure What It Claims To?” Oecologia 144 (2): 177–186.
APA
LUYSSAERT, S., Staelens, J., & De Schrijver, A. (2005). Does the commonly used estimator of nutrient resorption in tree foliage actually measure what it claims to? OECOLOGIA, 144(2), 177–186.
Vancouver
1.
LUYSSAERT S, Staelens J, De Schrijver A. Does the commonly used estimator of nutrient resorption in tree foliage actually measure what it claims to? OECOLOGIA. Springer; 2005;144(2):177–86.
MLA
LUYSSAERT, S, Jeroen Staelens, and An De Schrijver. “Does the Commonly Used Estimator of Nutrient Resorption in Tree Foliage Actually Measure What It Claims To?” OECOLOGIA 144.2 (2005): 177–186. Print.
@article{341272,
  author       = {LUYSSAERT, S and Staelens, Jeroen and De Schrijver, An},
  issn         = {0029-8549},
  journal      = {OECOLOGIA},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {177--186},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  title        = {Does the commonly used estimator of nutrient resorption in tree foliage actually measure what it claims to?},
  volume       = {144},
  year         = {2005},
}

Web of Science
Times cited: