Advanced search
Add to list

Object class or association class? Testing the user effect on cardinality interpretation

Geert Poels (UGent) , Frederik Gailly (UGent) , Ann Maes (UGent) and Roland Paemeleire
Author
Organization

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Poels, Geert, Frederik Gailly, Ann Maes, et al. “Object Class or Association Class? Testing the User Effect on Cardinality Interpretation.” PERSPECTIVES IN CONCEPTUAL MODELING 3770 (2005): 33–42. Print.
APA
Poels, G., Gailly, F., Maes, A., & Paemeleire, R. (2005). Object class or association class? Testing the user effect on cardinality interpretation. PERSPECTIVES IN CONCEPTUAL MODELING, 3770, 33–42.
Chicago author-date
Poels, Geert, Frederik Gailly, Ann Maes, and Roland Paemeleire. 2005. “Object Class or Association Class? Testing the User Effect on Cardinality Interpretation.” Perspectives in Conceptual Modeling 3770: 33–42.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Poels, Geert, Frederik Gailly, Ann Maes, and Roland Paemeleire. 2005. “Object Class or Association Class? Testing the User Effect on Cardinality Interpretation.” Perspectives in Conceptual Modeling 3770: 33–42.
Vancouver
1.
Poels G, Gailly F, Maes A, Paemeleire R. Object class or association class? Testing the user effect on cardinality interpretation. PERSPECTIVES IN CONCEPTUAL MODELING. SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN; 2005;3770:33–42.
IEEE
[1]
G. Poels, F. Gailly, A. Maes, and R. Paemeleire, “Object class or association class? Testing the user effect on cardinality interpretation,” PERSPECTIVES IN CONCEPTUAL MODELING, vol. 3770, pp. 33–42, 2005.
@article{325521,
  author       = {Poels, Geert and Gailly, Frederik and Maes, Ann and Paemeleire, Roland},
  issn         = {0302-9743},
  journal      = {PERSPECTIVES IN CONCEPTUAL MODELING},
  language     = {eng},
  pages        = {33--42},
  publisher    = {SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN},
  title        = {Object class or association class? Testing the user effect on cardinality interpretation},
  volume       = {3770},
  year         = {2005},
}

Web of Science
Times cited: