Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Analyzing employee agreement on maturity assessment tools for organizations

Jurgen Willems, Joachim Van den Bergh and Dirk Deschoolmeester (2012) KNOWLEDGE AND PROCES MANAGEMENT. 19(3). p.142-147
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (letterNote)
publication status
published
subject
journal title
KNOWLEDGE AND PROCES MANAGEMENT
Knowl. process manag.
volume
19
issue
3
pages
142 - 147
ISSN
1092-4604
DOI
10.1002/kpm.1389
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A2
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
VABB id
c:vabb:338826
VABB type
VABB-1
id
3202132
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-3202132
date created
2013-04-25 11:30:08
date last changed
2016-12-19 15:43:15
@article{3202132,
  author       = {Willems, Jurgen  and Van den Bergh, Joachim and Deschoolmeester, Dirk},
  issn         = {1092-4604},
  journal      = {KNOWLEDGE AND PROCES MANAGEMENT},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {3},
  pages        = {142--147},
  title        = {Analyzing employee agreement on maturity assessment tools for organizations},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1389},
  volume       = {19},
  year         = {2012},
}

Chicago
Willems, Jurgen , Joachim Van den Bergh, and Dirk Deschoolmeester. 2012. “Analyzing Employee Agreement on Maturity Assessment Tools for Organizations.” Knowledge and Proces Management 19 (3): 142–147.
APA
Willems, Jurgen , Van den Bergh, J., & Deschoolmeester, D. (2012). Analyzing employee agreement on maturity assessment tools for organizations. KNOWLEDGE AND PROCES MANAGEMENT, 19(3), 142–147.
Vancouver
1.
Willems J, Van den Bergh J, Deschoolmeester D. Analyzing employee agreement on maturity assessment tools for organizations. KNOWLEDGE AND PROCES MANAGEMENT. 2012;19(3):142–7.
MLA
Willems, Jurgen , Joachim Van den Bergh, and Dirk Deschoolmeester. “Analyzing Employee Agreement on Maturity Assessment Tools for Organizations.” KNOWLEDGE AND PROCES MANAGEMENT 19.3 (2012): 142–147. Print.