A case study on the comparison of different software tools for automated quantification of peptides
- Author
- Niklaas Colaert (UGent) , Joël Vandekerckhove (UGent) , Lennart Martens (UGent) and Kris Gevaert (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- MS-driven proteomics has evolved over the past two decades to a high tech and high impact research field. Two distinct factors clearly influenced its expansion: the rapid growth of an arsenal of instrument and proteomic techniques that led to an explosion of high quality data and the development of software tools to analyze and interpret these data which boosted the number of scientific discoveries. In analogy with the benchmarking of new instruments and proteomic techniques, such software tools must be thoroughly tested and analyzed. Recently, new tools were developed for automatic peptide quantification in quantitative proteomic experiments. Here we present a case study where the most recent and frequently used tools are analyzed and compared.
- Keywords
- Automated quantification, Mascot Distiller, MasQuant, MsQuant, Census, Rover
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 1.62 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-3193617
- MLA
- Colaert, Niklaas, et al. “A Case Study on the Comparison of Different Software Tools for Automated Quantification of Peptides.” Gel-Free Proteomics : Methods and Protocols, edited by Kris Gevaert and Joël Vandekerckhove, vol. 753, Humana Press, 2011, pp. 373–98, doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-148-2_25.
- APA
- Colaert, N., Vandekerckhove, J., Martens, L., & Gevaert, K. (2011). A case study on the comparison of different software tools for automated quantification of peptides. In K. Gevaert & J. Vandekerckhove (Eds.), Gel-free proteomics : methods and protocols (Vol. 753, pp. 373–398). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-148-2_25
- Chicago author-date
- Colaert, Niklaas, Joël Vandekerckhove, Lennart Martens, and Kris Gevaert. 2011. “A Case Study on the Comparison of Different Software Tools for Automated Quantification of Peptides.” In Gel-Free Proteomics : Methods and Protocols, edited by Kris Gevaert and Joël Vandekerckhove, 753:373–98. New York, NY, USA: Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-148-2_25.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Colaert, Niklaas, Joël Vandekerckhove, Lennart Martens, and Kris Gevaert. 2011. “A Case Study on the Comparison of Different Software Tools for Automated Quantification of Peptides.” In Gel-Free Proteomics : Methods and Protocols, ed by. Kris Gevaert and Joël Vandekerckhove, 753:373–398. New York, NY, USA: Humana Press. doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-148-2_25.
- Vancouver
- 1.Colaert N, Vandekerckhove J, Martens L, Gevaert K. A case study on the comparison of different software tools for automated quantification of peptides. In: Gevaert K, Vandekerckhove J, editors. Gel-free proteomics : methods and protocols. New York, NY, USA: Humana Press; 2011. p. 373–98.
- IEEE
- [1]N. Colaert, J. Vandekerckhove, L. Martens, and K. Gevaert, “A case study on the comparison of different software tools for automated quantification of peptides,” in Gel-free proteomics : methods and protocols, vol. 753, K. Gevaert and J. Vandekerckhove, Eds. New York, NY, USA: Humana Press, 2011, pp. 373–398.
@incollection{3193617, abstract = {{MS-driven proteomics has evolved over the past two decades to a high tech and high impact research field. Two distinct factors clearly influenced its expansion: the rapid growth of an arsenal of instrument and proteomic techniques that led to an explosion of high quality data and the development of software tools to analyze and interpret these data which boosted the number of scientific discoveries. In analogy with the benchmarking of new instruments and proteomic techniques, such software tools must be thoroughly tested and analyzed. Recently, new tools were developed for automatic peptide quantification in quantitative proteomic experiments. Here we present a case study where the most recent and frequently used tools are analyzed and compared.}}, author = {{Colaert, Niklaas and Vandekerckhove, Joël and Martens, Lennart and Gevaert, Kris}}, booktitle = {{Gel-free proteomics : methods and protocols}}, editor = {{Gevaert, Kris and Vandekerckhove, Joël}}, isbn = {{9781617791482}}, issn = {{1064-3745}}, keywords = {{Automated quantification,Mascot Distiller,MasQuant,MsQuant,Census,Rover}}, language = {{eng}}, pages = {{373--398}}, publisher = {{Humana Press}}, series = {{Methods in Molecular Biology}}, title = {{A case study on the comparison of different software tools for automated quantification of peptides}}, url = {{http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-148-2_25}}, volume = {{753}}, year = {{2011}}, }
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric