Advanced search
1 file | 228.38 KB Add to list

Environmental stimulation does not reduce impulsive choice in ADHD: a 'Pink Noise' study

Baris Metin (UGent) , Herbert Roeyers (UGent) , Roeljan Wiersema (UGent) , Roos Gasthuys (UGent) and Edmund Barke (UGent)
Author
Organization
Abstract
Objective: The preference for sooner smaller over larger later rewards is a prominent manifestation of impulsivity in ADHD. According to the State Regulation Deficit (SRD) model, this impulsive choice is the result of impaired regulation of arousal level and can be alleviated by adding environmental stimulation to increase levels of arousal. Method: To test this prediction, we studied the effects of adding background pink noise on impulsive choice using a classical and new adjusting choice delay task in a sample of 25 children with ADHD and 28 controls. Results: Children with ADHD made more impulsive choices than controls. Adding noise did not reduce impulsive choice in ADHD. Conclusion: The findings add to the existing evidence on impulsive choice in ADHD, but no evidence is found for the SRD model's explanation of this behavioral style. Alternative explanations for impulsive choice in ADHD are discussed.
Keywords
REACTION-TIME VARIABILITY, ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER, DELAY AVERSION, EVENT RATE, EXECUTIVE DYSFUNCTION, COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE, SUSTAINED ATTENTION, RESPONSE-INHIBITION, LOCUS-COERULEUS, CHILDREN, ADHD, pink noise, delay aversion, state regulation deficits, impulsivity

Downloads

  • Metin Roeyers JoAD.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 228.38 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Metin, Baris, et al. “Environmental Stimulation Does Not Reduce Impulsive Choice in ADHD: A ‘Pink Noise’ Study.” JOURNAL OF ATTENTION DISORDERS, vol. 20, no. 1, 2016, pp. 63–70, doi:10.1177/1087054713479667.
APA
Metin, B., Roeyers, H., Wiersema, R., Gasthuys, R., & Barke, E. (2016). Environmental stimulation does not reduce impulsive choice in ADHD: a “Pink Noise” study. JOURNAL OF ATTENTION DISORDERS, 20(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054713479667
Chicago author-date
Metin, Baris, Herbert Roeyers, Roeljan Wiersema, Roos Gasthuys, and Edmund Barke. 2016. “Environmental Stimulation Does Not Reduce Impulsive Choice in ADHD: A ‘Pink Noise’ Study.” JOURNAL OF ATTENTION DISORDERS 20 (1): 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054713479667.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Metin, Baris, Herbert Roeyers, Roeljan Wiersema, Roos Gasthuys, and Edmund Barke. 2016. “Environmental Stimulation Does Not Reduce Impulsive Choice in ADHD: A ‘Pink Noise’ Study.” JOURNAL OF ATTENTION DISORDERS 20 (1): 63–70. doi:10.1177/1087054713479667.
Vancouver
1.
Metin B, Roeyers H, Wiersema R, Gasthuys R, Barke E. Environmental stimulation does not reduce impulsive choice in ADHD: a “Pink Noise” study. JOURNAL OF ATTENTION DISORDERS. 2016;20(1):63–70.
IEEE
[1]
B. Metin, H. Roeyers, R. Wiersema, R. Gasthuys, and E. Barke, “Environmental stimulation does not reduce impulsive choice in ADHD: a ‘Pink Noise’ study,” JOURNAL OF ATTENTION DISORDERS, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 63–70, 2016.
@article{3183812,
  abstract     = {{Objective: The preference for sooner smaller over larger later rewards is a prominent manifestation of impulsivity in ADHD. According to the State Regulation Deficit (SRD) model, this impulsive choice is the result of impaired regulation of arousal level and can be alleviated by adding environmental stimulation to increase levels of arousal. Method: To test this prediction, we studied the effects of adding background pink noise on impulsive choice using a classical and new adjusting choice delay task in a sample of 25 children with ADHD and 28 controls. Results: Children with ADHD made more impulsive choices than controls. Adding noise did not reduce impulsive choice in ADHD. Conclusion: The findings add to the existing evidence on impulsive choice in ADHD, but no evidence is found for the SRD model's explanation of this behavioral style. Alternative explanations for impulsive choice in ADHD are discussed.}},
  author       = {{Metin, Baris and Roeyers, Herbert and Wiersema, Roeljan and Gasthuys, Roos and Barke, Edmund}},
  issn         = {{1087-0547}},
  journal      = {{JOURNAL OF ATTENTION DISORDERS}},
  keywords     = {{REACTION-TIME VARIABILITY,ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER,DELAY AVERSION,EVENT RATE,EXECUTIVE DYSFUNCTION,COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE,SUSTAINED ATTENTION,RESPONSE-INHIBITION,LOCUS-COERULEUS,CHILDREN,ADHD,pink noise,delay aversion,state regulation deficits,impulsivity}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{63--70}},
  title        = {{Environmental stimulation does not reduce impulsive choice in ADHD: a 'Pink Noise' study}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1177/1087054713479667}},
  volume       = {{20}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: