Advanced search
1 file | 1.00 MB

Antibiotics for clinically diagnosed acute rhinosinusitis in adults

Author
Organization
Abstract
Background: In primary care settings, the diagnosis of rhinosinusitis is generally based on clinical signs and symptoms. Technical investigations are not routinely performed, nor recommended. Individual trials show a trend in favour of antibiotics, but the balance of benefit versus harm is unclear. Objectives: To assess the effect of antibiotics in adults with clinically diagnosed rhinosinusitis in primary care settings. Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2012), MEDLINE (January 1950 to February week 4, 2012) and EMBASE (January 1974 to February 2012). Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of antibiotics versus placebo in participants with rhinosinusitis-like signs or symptoms. Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We contacted trial authors for additional information. We collected information on adverse effects from the trials. Main results: We included 10 trials involving 2450 participants. Overall, the risk of bias in these studies was low. Irrespective of the treatment group, 47% of participants were cured after one week and 71% after 14 days. Antibiotics can shorten the time to cure, but only five more participants per 100 will cure faster at any time point between 7 and 14 days if they receive antibiotics instead of placebo (number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB)) 18 (95% confidence interval (CI) 10 to 115, I2 statistic 0%, eight trials). Purulent secretion resolves faster with antibiotics (odds ratio (OR) 1.58 (95% CI 1.13 to 2.22)), (NNTB 11, 95% CI 6 to 51, I2 statistic 0%, three trials). However, 27% of the participants who received antibiotics and 15% of those who received placebo experienced adverse events (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.60 to 2.77) (number needed to treat to harm (NNTH)) 8 (95% CI 6 to 13, I2 statistic 13%, seven trials). More participants in the placebo group needed to start antibiotic therapy because of an abnormal course of rhinosinusitis (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.66), NNTH 20 (95% CI 14 to 35, I2 statistic 0%, eight trials). Only one disease-related complication (brain abscess) occurred in a patient treated with antibiotics. Authors' conclusions: The potential benefit of antibiotics in the treatment of clinically diagnosed acute rhinosinusitis needs to be seen in the context of a high prevalence of adverse events. Taking into account antibiotic resistance and the very low incidence of serious complications, we conclude that there is no place for antibiotics for the patient with clinically diagnosed, uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis. This review cannot make recommendations for children, patients with a suppressed immune system and patients with severe disease, as these populations were not included in the available trials.
Keywords
PRIMARY-CARE, PENICILLIN V, RADIOLOGICAL SIGNS, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL, DOUBLE-BLIND, GENERAL-PRACTICE, COMMON COLD, AMOXICILLIN-CLAVULANATE, ACUTE MAXILLARY SINUSITIS, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 1.00 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Lemiengre, Marieke, Marie van Driel, Dan Merenstein, James Young, and An De Sutter. 2012. “Antibiotics for Clinically Diagnosed Acute Rhinosinusitis in Adults.” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (10).
APA
Lemiengre, Marieke, van Driel, M., Merenstein, D., Young, J., & De Sutter, A. (2012). Antibiotics for clinically diagnosed acute rhinosinusitis in adults. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, (10).
Vancouver
1.
Lemiengre M, van Driel M, Merenstein D, Young J, De Sutter A. Antibiotics for clinically diagnosed acute rhinosinusitis in adults. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS. 2012;(10).
MLA
Lemiengre, Marieke, Marie van Driel, Dan Merenstein, et al. “Antibiotics for Clinically Diagnosed Acute Rhinosinusitis in Adults.” COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 10 (2012): n. pag. Print.
@article{3172434,
  abstract     = {Background: In primary care settings, the diagnosis of rhinosinusitis is generally based on clinical signs and symptoms. Technical investigations are not routinely performed, nor recommended. Individual trials show a trend in favour of antibiotics, but the balance of benefit versus harm is unclear.
Objectives: To assess the effect of antibiotics in adults with clinically diagnosed rhinosinusitis in primary care settings.
Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2012), MEDLINE (January 1950 to February week 4, 2012) and EMBASE (January 1974 to February 2012).
Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of antibiotics versus placebo in participants with rhinosinusitis-like signs or symptoms.
Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We contacted trial authors for additional information. We collected information on adverse effects from the trials.
Main results: We included 10 trials involving 2450 participants. Overall, the risk of bias in these studies was low. Irrespective of the treatment group, 47\% of participants were cured after one week and 71\% after 14 days. Antibiotics can shorten the time to cure, but only five more participants per 100 will cure faster at any time point between 7 and 14 days if they receive antibiotics instead of placebo (number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB)) 18 (95\% confidence interval (CI) 10 to 115, I2 statistic 0\%, eight trials). Purulent secretion resolves faster with antibiotics (odds ratio (OR) 1.58 (95\% CI 1.13 to 2.22)), (NNTB 11, 95\% CI 6 to 51, I2 statistic 0\%, three trials). However, 27\% of the participants who received antibiotics and 15\% of those who received placebo experienced adverse events (OR 2.10, 95\% CI 1.60 to 2.77) (number needed to treat to harm (NNTH)) 8 (95\% CI 6 to 13, I2 statistic 13\%, seven trials). More participants in the placebo group needed to start antibiotic therapy because of an abnormal course of rhinosinusitis (OR 0.49, 95\% CI 0.36 to 0.66), NNTH 20 (95\% CI 14 to 35, I2 statistic 0\%, eight trials). Only one disease-related complication (brain abscess) occurred in a patient treated with antibiotics.
Authors' conclusions: The potential benefit of antibiotics in the treatment of clinically diagnosed acute rhinosinusitis needs to be seen in the context of a high prevalence of adverse events. Taking into account antibiotic resistance and the very low incidence of serious complications, we conclude that there is no place for antibiotics for the patient with clinically diagnosed, uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis. This review cannot make recommendations for children, patients with a suppressed immune system and patients with severe disease, as these populations were not included in the available trials.},
  articleno    = {CD006089},
  author       = {Lemiengre, Marieke and van Driel, Marie and Merenstein, Dan and Young, James and De Sutter, An},
  issn         = {1469-493X},
  journal      = {COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {10},
  pages        = {82},
  title        = {Antibiotics for clinically diagnosed acute rhinosinusitis in adults},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006089.pub4},
  year         = {2012},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: