Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Perception and communication of flood risks: a systematic review of empirical research

Wim Kellens, Teun Terpstra and Philippe De Maeyer UGent (2013) RISK ANALYSIS. 33(1). p.24-49
abstract
Flood hazards are the most common and destructive of all natural disasters. For decades, experts have been examining how flood losses can be mitigated. Just as in other risk domains, the study of risk perception and risk communication has gained increasing interest in flood risk management. Because of this research growth, a review of the state of the art in this domain is believed necessary. The review comprises 57 empirically based peer-reviewed articles on flood risk perception and communication from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The characteristics of these articles are listed in a comprehensive table, presenting research design, research variables, and key findings. From this review, it follows that the majority of studies are of exploratory nature and have not applied any of the theoretical frameworks that are available in social science research. Consequently, a methodological standardization in measuring and analyzing people's flood risk perceptions and their adaptive behaviors is hardly present. This heterogeneity leads to difficulties in comparing results among studies. It is also shown that theoretical and empirical studies on flood risk communication are nearly nonexistent. The article concludes with a summary on methodological issues in the fields of flood-risk perception and flood-risk communication and proposes an agenda for future research.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
NATURAL HAZARDS, PUBLIC PERCEPTION, risk perception, literature review, risk communication, flood risk, SOCIAL PERCEPTIONS, MITIGATION, INFORMATION, MANAGEMENT, REGION, PREPAREDNESS, BEHAVIOR, GERMANY
journal title
RISK ANALYSIS
Risk Anal.
volume
33
issue
1
pages
24 - 49
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000313728300004
JCR category
SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS
JCR impact factor
1.974 (2013)
JCR rank
7/45 (2013)
JCR quartile
1 (2013)
ISSN
0272-4332
DOI
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01844.x
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
3163311
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-3163311
date created
2013-03-12 09:37:52
date last changed
2017-05-31 09:45:51
@article{3163311,
  abstract     = {Flood hazards are the most common and destructive of all natural disasters. For decades, experts have been examining how flood losses can be mitigated. Just as in other risk domains, the study of risk perception and risk communication has gained increasing interest in flood risk management. Because of this research growth, a review of the state of the art in this domain is believed necessary. The review comprises 57 empirically based peer-reviewed articles on flood risk perception and communication from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The characteristics of these articles are listed in a comprehensive table, presenting research design, research variables, and key findings. From this review, it follows that the majority of studies are of exploratory nature and have not applied any of the theoretical frameworks that are available in social science research. Consequently, a methodological standardization in measuring and analyzing people's flood risk perceptions and their adaptive behaviors is hardly present. This heterogeneity leads to difficulties in comparing results among studies. It is also shown that theoretical and empirical studies on flood risk communication are nearly nonexistent. The article concludes with a summary on methodological issues in the fields of flood-risk perception and flood-risk communication and proposes an agenda for future research.},
  author       = {Kellens, Wim and Terpstra, Teun and De Maeyer, Philippe},
  issn         = {0272-4332},
  journal      = {RISK ANALYSIS},
  keyword      = {NATURAL HAZARDS,PUBLIC PERCEPTION,risk perception,literature review,risk communication,flood risk,SOCIAL PERCEPTIONS,MITIGATION,INFORMATION,MANAGEMENT,REGION,PREPAREDNESS,BEHAVIOR,GERMANY},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {24--49},
  title        = {Perception and communication of flood risks: a systematic review of empirical research},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01844.x},
  volume       = {33},
  year         = {2013},
}

Chicago
Kellens, Wim, Teun Terpstra, and Philippe De Maeyer. 2013. “Perception and Communication of Flood Risks: a Systematic Review of Empirical Research.” Risk Analysis 33 (1): 24–49.
APA
Kellens, W., Terpstra, T., & De Maeyer, P. (2013). Perception and communication of flood risks: a systematic review of empirical research. RISK ANALYSIS, 33(1), 24–49.
Vancouver
1.
Kellens W, Terpstra T, De Maeyer P. Perception and communication of flood risks: a systematic review of empirical research. RISK ANALYSIS. 2013;33(1):24–49.
MLA
Kellens, Wim, Teun Terpstra, and Philippe De Maeyer. “Perception and Communication of Flood Risks: a Systematic Review of Empirical Research.” RISK ANALYSIS 33.1 (2013): 24–49. Print.