Advanced search
1 file | 297.05 KB

Een kritische kijk op onderzoeks- en publicatieontwikkelingen in de arbeids- en organisatiepsychologie

Filip Lievens (UGent) and Frederik Anseel (UGent)
(2012) GEDRAG & ORGANISATIE. 25(3). p.211-221
Author
Organization
Abstract
The aim of this article consists of critically reviewing research and publication trends in the field of industrial and organizational psychology. The focus is on four trends: (1) the extreme importance of theory, (2) the loss of the identity of industrial and organizational psychology, (3) the cumbersome nature of the review process, and (4) the deficient reporting of methodology and results in light of replication research. After each trend recommendations are made to turn the situation around. We also hope that this article might generate the necessary discussion about these four trends.
Keywords
industrial and organizational psychology, EXTERNAL VALIDITY, theory, publication, methodology

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 297.05 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Lievens, Filip, and Frederik Anseel. 2012. “Een Kritische Kijk Op Onderzoeks- En Publicatieontwikkelingen in De Arbeids- En Organisatiepsychologie.” Gedrag & Organisatie 25 (3): 211–221.
APA
Lievens, F., & Anseel, F. (2012). Een kritische kijk op onderzoeks- en publicatieontwikkelingen in de arbeids- en organisatiepsychologie. GEDRAG & ORGANISATIE, 25(3), 211–221.
Vancouver
1.
Lievens F, Anseel F. Een kritische kijk op onderzoeks- en publicatieontwikkelingen in de arbeids- en organisatiepsychologie. GEDRAG & ORGANISATIE. 2012;25(3):211–21.
MLA
Lievens, Filip, and Frederik Anseel. “Een Kritische Kijk Op Onderzoeks- En Publicatieontwikkelingen in De Arbeids- En Organisatiepsychologie.” GEDRAG & ORGANISATIE 25.3 (2012): 211–221. Print.
@article{3141400,
  abstract     = {The aim of this article consists of critically reviewing research and publication trends in the field of industrial and organizational psychology. The focus is on four trends: (1) the extreme importance of theory, (2) the loss of the identity of industrial and organizational psychology, (3) the cumbersome nature of the review process, and (4) the deficient reporting of methodology and results in light of replication research. After each trend recommendations are made to turn the situation around. We also hope that this article might generate the necessary discussion about these four trends.},
  author       = {Lievens, Filip and Anseel, Frederik},
  issn         = {0921-5077},
  journal      = {GEDRAG \& ORGANISATIE},
  keyword      = {industrial and organizational psychology,EXTERNAL VALIDITY,theory,publication,methodology},
  language     = {dut},
  number       = {3},
  pages        = {211--221},
  title        = {Een kritische kijk op onderzoeks- en publicatieontwikkelingen in de arbeids- en organisatiepsychologie},
  volume       = {25},
  year         = {2012},
}

Web of Science
Times cited: