Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Een kritische kijk op onderzoeks- en publicatieontwikkelingen in de arbeids- en organisatiepsychologie

Filip Lievens UGent and Frederik Anseel UGent (2012) GEDRAG & ORGANISATIE. 25(3). p.211-221
abstract
The aim of this article consists of critically reviewing research and publication trends in the field of industrial and organizational psychology. The focus is on four trends: (1) the extreme importance of theory, (2) the loss of the identity of industrial and organizational psychology, (3) the cumbersome nature of the review process, and (4) the deficient reporting of methodology and results in light of replication research. After each trend recommendations are made to turn the situation around. We also hope that this article might generate the necessary discussion about these four trends.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
alternative title
A critical review of research and publication trends in the field of industrial and organizational psychology
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
industrial and organizational psychology, EXTERNAL VALIDITY, theory, publication, methodology
journal title
GEDRAG & ORGANISATIE
Gedrag Organ.
volume
25
issue
3
pages
211 - 221
Web of Science type
Review
Web of Science id
000309573500002
JCR category
PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
JCR impact factor
0.943 (2012)
JCR rank
49/72 (2012)
JCR quartile
3 (2012)
ISSN
0921-5077
language
Dutch
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
3141400
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-3141400
date created
2013-02-25 10:05:43
date last changed
2016-12-19 15:43:46
@article{3141400,
  abstract     = {The aim of this article consists of critically reviewing research and publication trends in the field of industrial and organizational psychology. The focus is on four trends: (1) the extreme importance of theory, (2) the loss of the identity of industrial and organizational psychology, (3) the cumbersome nature of the review process, and (4) the deficient reporting of methodology and results in light of replication research. After each trend recommendations are made to turn the situation around. We also hope that this article might generate the necessary discussion about these four trends.},
  author       = {Lievens, Filip and Anseel, Frederik},
  issn         = {0921-5077},
  journal      = {GEDRAG \& ORGANISATIE},
  keyword      = {industrial and organizational psychology,EXTERNAL VALIDITY,theory,publication,methodology},
  language     = {dut},
  number       = {3},
  pages        = {211--221},
  title        = {Een kritische kijk op onderzoeks- en publicatieontwikkelingen in de arbeids- en organisatiepsychologie},
  volume       = {25},
  year         = {2012},
}

Chicago
Lievens, Filip, and Frederik Anseel. 2012. “Een Kritische Kijk Op Onderzoeks- En Publicatieontwikkelingen in De Arbeids- En Organisatiepsychologie.” Gedrag & Organisatie 25 (3): 211–221.
APA
Lievens, F., & Anseel, F. (2012). Een kritische kijk op onderzoeks- en publicatieontwikkelingen in de arbeids- en organisatiepsychologie. GEDRAG & ORGANISATIE, 25(3), 211–221.
Vancouver
1.
Lievens F, Anseel F. Een kritische kijk op onderzoeks- en publicatieontwikkelingen in de arbeids- en organisatiepsychologie. GEDRAG & ORGANISATIE. 2012;25(3):211–21.
MLA
Lievens, Filip, and Frederik Anseel. “Een Kritische Kijk Op Onderzoeks- En Publicatieontwikkelingen in De Arbeids- En Organisatiepsychologie.” GEDRAG & ORGANISATIE 25.3 (2012): 211–221. Print.