Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Comparison of different techniques for strain monitoring of a biaxially loaded cruciform specimen

C Ramault, A Makris, D Van Hemelrijck, Ebrahim Lamkanfi and Wim Van Paepegem UGent (2011) STRAIN. 47(Suppl. 2). p.210-217
abstract
This study focuses on the evaluation of several strain measuring techniques for the instrumentation of an in-plane biaxial test bench. Strain gages, electronic speckle pattern interferometry (ESPI) and digital image correlation (DIC) were used combined or separately to measure the strains in the central gauge area of a biaxially loaded cruciform composite specimen. Applicability of the technique for this specific test and accuracy of the results are important parameters in the evaluation process of the different strain measuring techniques. The results of the three techniques are compared with the results obtained with a 3D finite element (FE) model. It is shown that DIC is the most promising technique because of its full-field character and ability to cope with vibrations of the test bench. The main drawback remains its incapability to correlate across discontinuities.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
FAILURE, biaxial testing, DESIGN, C/C COMPOSITE, DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATION, composite materials, strain measuring
journal title
STRAIN
Strain
volume
47
issue
Suppl. 2
pages
210 - 217
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000298481800023
JCR category
MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING
JCR impact factor
1.103 (2011)
JCR rank
8/32 (2011)
JCR quartile
2 (2011)
ISSN
0039-2103
DOI
10.1111/j.1475-1305.2010.00760.x
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
3133657
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-3133657
date created
2013-02-18 10:49:03
date last changed
2017-03-09 12:42:28
@article{3133657,
  abstract     = {This study focuses on the evaluation of several strain measuring techniques for the instrumentation of an in-plane biaxial test bench. Strain gages, electronic speckle pattern interferometry (ESPI) and digital image correlation (DIC) were used combined or separately to measure the strains in the central gauge area of a biaxially loaded cruciform composite specimen. Applicability of the technique for this specific test and accuracy of the results are important parameters in the evaluation process of the different strain measuring techniques. The results of the three techniques are compared with the results obtained with a 3D finite element (FE) model. It is shown that DIC is the most promising technique because of its full-field character and ability to cope with vibrations of the test bench. The main drawback remains its incapability to correlate across discontinuities.},
  author       = {Ramault, C and Makris, A and Van Hemelrijck, D and Lamkanfi, Ebrahim and Van Paepegem, Wim},
  issn         = {0039-2103},
  journal      = {STRAIN},
  keyword      = {FAILURE,biaxial testing,DESIGN,C/C COMPOSITE,DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATION,composite materials,strain measuring},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {Suppl. 2},
  pages        = {210--217},
  title        = {Comparison of different techniques for strain monitoring of a biaxially loaded cruciform specimen},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1305.2010.00760.x},
  volume       = {47},
  year         = {2011},
}

Chicago
Ramault, C, A Makris, D Van Hemelrijck, Ebrahim Lamkanfi, and Wim Van Paepegem. 2011. “Comparison of Different Techniques for Strain Monitoring of a Biaxially Loaded Cruciform Specimen.” Strain 47 (Suppl. 2): 210–217.
APA
Ramault, C, Makris, A., Van Hemelrijck, D., Lamkanfi, E., & Van Paepegem, W. (2011). Comparison of different techniques for strain monitoring of a biaxially loaded cruciform specimen. STRAIN, 47(Suppl. 2), 210–217.
Vancouver
1.
Ramault C, Makris A, Van Hemelrijck D, Lamkanfi E, Van Paepegem W. Comparison of different techniques for strain monitoring of a biaxially loaded cruciform specimen. STRAIN. 2011;47(Suppl. 2):210–7.
MLA
Ramault, C, A Makris, D Van Hemelrijck, et al. “Comparison of Different Techniques for Strain Monitoring of a Biaxially Loaded Cruciform Specimen.” STRAIN 47.Suppl. 2 (2011): 210–217. Print.