Advanced search
1 file | 211.83 KB

Returnees' perspectives on their re-migration processes

Ine Lietaert (UGent) , Ilse Derluyn (UGent) and Eric Broekaert (UGent)
(2014) INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION. 52(5). p.144-158
Author
Organization
Abstract
The return of refugees and migrants back to their country of origin is an important topic on the agenda of Western European governments, as return is considered as the most durable solution for the refugee problem, and as an instrument with which to tackle illegal migration. However, these migration policies generally lack a clear evidence base, as little studies have focused on returnees' current living situations and on their perspectives on the re-migration process. In this paper we therefore try to listen to returnees' voices, through in-depth interviews with four Nepalese migrants both before (in Belgium) and after (in Nepal) their return, and with 16 returnees after their return to Nepal. The interviews show how most returnees start with a disadvantageous point of departure to realize a successful return: mostly, they do not really depart voluntarily, and they only have limited possibilities for preparing their return and setting realistic expectations. But also, back in the home country, most returnees judge their current economic, social and political living situation as bad, meeting little of the expectations that they set before they returned. The participants consider the support they received through the NGOs' return programmes as minimal, because they are mostly limited to a small amount of financial support, and thus of little significance in these returnees' efforts to rebuild their lives in their home country. If return programmes want to make a difference in returnees' lives, they should have two extensive components in the home and the host country, incorporating in both components an integral approach, including economic, political, social and psychological aspects. Viewing these findings, it is not surprising that most interviewees eventually evaluate their return as unsuccessful, and many returnees consider re-emigration, all of which clearly questions the current basis of worldwide migration policies.
Keywords
migrants’ perspectives, Return migration, post-return situation

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 211.83 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Lietaert, Ine, Ilse Derluyn, and Eric Broekaert. 2014. “Returnees’ Perspectives on Their Re-migration Processes.” International Migration 52 (5): 144–158.
APA
Lietaert, I., Derluyn, I., & Broekaert, E. (2014). Returnees’ perspectives on their re-migration processes. INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION, 52(5), 144–158.
Vancouver
1.
Lietaert I, Derluyn I, Broekaert E. Returnees’ perspectives on their re-migration processes. INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION. 2014;52(5):144–58.
MLA
Lietaert, Ine, Ilse Derluyn, and Eric Broekaert. “Returnees’ Perspectives on Their Re-migration Processes.” INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION 52.5 (2014): 144–158. Print.
@article{3101013,
  abstract     = {The return of refugees and migrants back to their country of origin is an important topic on the agenda of Western European governments, as return is considered as the most durable solution for the refugee problem, and as an instrument with which to tackle illegal migration. However, these migration policies generally lack a clear evidence base, as little studies have focused on returnees' current living situations and on their perspectives on the re-migration process. In this paper we therefore try to listen to returnees' voices, through in-depth interviews with four Nepalese migrants both before (in Belgium) and after (in Nepal) their return, and with 16 returnees after their return to Nepal. The interviews show how most returnees start with a disadvantageous point of departure to realize a successful return: mostly, they do not really depart voluntarily, and they only have limited possibilities for preparing their return and setting realistic expectations. But also, back in the home country, most returnees judge their current economic, social and political living situation as bad, meeting little of the expectations that they set before they returned. The participants consider the support they received through the NGOs' return programmes as minimal, because they are mostly limited to a small amount of financial support, and thus of little significance in these returnees' efforts to rebuild their lives in their home country. If return programmes want to make a difference in returnees' lives, they should have two extensive components in the home and the host country, incorporating in both components an integral approach, including economic, political, social and psychological aspects. Viewing these findings, it is not surprising that most interviewees eventually evaluate their return as unsuccessful, and many returnees consider re-emigration, all of which clearly questions the current basis of worldwide migration policies.},
  author       = {Lietaert, Ine and Derluyn, Ilse and Broekaert, Eric},
  issn         = {0020-7985},
  journal      = {INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION},
  keywords     = {migrants’ perspectives,Return migration,post-return situation},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {5},
  pages        = {144--158},
  title        = {Returnees' perspectives on their re-migration processes},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imig.12052},
  volume       = {52},
  year         = {2014},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: