Comparison and pitfalls of different discretised solution methods for population balance models: a simulation study
- Author
- Ingmar Nopens (UGent) , Daan Beheydt and Peter Vanrolleghem (UGent)
- Organization
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-308539
- Chicago
- Nopens, Ingmar, Daan Beheydt, and Peter Vanrolleghem. 2005. “Comparison and Pitfalls of Different Discretised Solution Methods for Population Balance Models: a Simulation Study.” Computers & Chemical Engineering 29 (2): 367–377.
- APA
- Nopens, I., Beheydt, D., & Vanrolleghem, P. (2005). Comparison and pitfalls of different discretised solution methods for population balance models: a simulation study. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 29(2), 367–377.
- Vancouver
- 1.Nopens I, Beheydt D, Vanrolleghem P. Comparison and pitfalls of different discretised solution methods for population balance models: a simulation study. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING. PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD; 2005;29(2):367–77.
- MLA
- Nopens, Ingmar, Daan Beheydt, and Peter Vanrolleghem. “Comparison and Pitfalls of Different Discretised Solution Methods for Population Balance Models: a Simulation Study.” COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING 29.2 (2005): 367–377. Print.
@article{308539,
author = {Nopens, Ingmar and Beheydt, Daan and Vanrolleghem, Peter},
issn = {0098-1354},
journal = {COMPUTERS \& CHEMICAL ENGINEERING},
language = {eng},
number = {2},
pages = {367--377},
publisher = {PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD},
title = {Comparison and pitfalls of different discretised solution methods for population balance models: a simulation study},
volume = {29},
year = {2005},
}