Advanced search
1 file | 87.21 KB

A Belgian view (of the debate) on dat nooit meer: de nasleep van de Tweede Wereldoorlog in Nederland

Koen Aerts (UGent)
Author
Organization
Abstract
While the booming field of memory studies is characterised by a lack of a uniform and consistent methodology, Dot nooit meer [Never Again] seems to reject any theoretical analysis whatsoever. The author, Chris van der Heijden, relies on the journalistic motto 'show, don't tell'. Such a vision provides both the strength and the weakness of the argument. On the one hand he manages to dig up a wealth of empirical information; on the other hand, the evidence of his thesis is solely dependent on the selection of sources by the author. This book therefore is not only a challenge for Dutch war historiography, but also indirectly an urgent call for self-reflection on the international research on collective memories. To what extent is its associative and anecdotal argument a relevant interpretation of how Dutch society remembered and rewrote the past World War II? To what extent can we develop an epistemologically justified and adequate methodology that allows the analysis of the genesis of a collective memory?

Downloads

  • 8550-14812-1-PB.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 87.21 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Aerts, Koen. 2013. “A Belgian View (of the Debate) on Dat Nooit Meer: De Nasleep Van De Tweede Wereldoorlog in Nederland.” Bmgn-the Low Countries Historical Review 128 (2): 81–89.
APA
Aerts, Koen. (2013). A Belgian view (of the debate) on dat nooit meer: de nasleep van de Tweede Wereldoorlog in Nederland. BMGN-THE LOW COUNTRIES HISTORICAL REVIEW, 128(2), 81–89.
Vancouver
1.
Aerts K. A Belgian view (of the debate) on dat nooit meer: de nasleep van de Tweede Wereldoorlog in Nederland. BMGN-THE LOW COUNTRIES HISTORICAL REVIEW. 2013;128(2):81–9.
MLA
Aerts, Koen. “A Belgian View (of the Debate) on Dat Nooit Meer: De Nasleep Van De Tweede Wereldoorlog in Nederland.” BMGN-THE LOW COUNTRIES HISTORICAL REVIEW 128.2 (2013): 81–89. Print.
@article{3078722,
  abstract     = {While the booming field of memory studies is characterised by a lack of a uniform and consistent methodology, Dot nooit meer [Never Again] seems to reject any theoretical analysis whatsoever. The author, Chris van der Heijden, relies on the journalistic motto 'show, don't tell'. Such a vision provides both the strength and the weakness of the argument. On the one hand he manages to dig up a wealth of empirical information; on the other hand, the evidence of his thesis is solely dependent on the selection of sources by the author. This book therefore is not only a challenge for Dutch war historiography, but also indirectly an urgent call for self-reflection on the international research on collective memories. To what extent is its associative and anecdotal argument a relevant interpretation of how Dutch society remembered and rewrote the past World War II? To what extent can we develop an epistemologically justified and adequate methodology that allows the analysis of the genesis of a collective memory?},
  author       = {Aerts, Koen},
  issn         = {0165-0505},
  journal      = {BMGN-THE LOW COUNTRIES HISTORICAL REVIEW},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {81--89},
  title        = {A Belgian view (of the debate) on dat nooit meer: de nasleep van de Tweede Wereldoorlog in Nederland},
  volume       = {128},
  year         = {2013},
}

Web of Science
Times cited: