Advanced search
1 file | 214.69 KB

Rationally evaluating inconsistent theories

Erik Weber (UGent) and Maarten Van Dyck (UGent)
(2012) PHILOSOPHICA (GENT). 86. p.83-99
Author
Organization

Downloads

  • Philosophica86.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 214.69 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Weber, Erik, and Maarten Van Dyck. 2012. “Rationally Evaluating Inconsistent Theories.” Philosophica (gent) 86: 83–99.
APA
Weber, E., & Van Dyck, M. (2012). Rationally evaluating inconsistent theories. PHILOSOPHICA (GENT), 86, 83–99.
Vancouver
1.
Weber E, Van Dyck M. Rationally evaluating inconsistent theories. PHILOSOPHICA (GENT). 2012;86:83–99.
MLA
Weber, Erik, and Maarten Van Dyck. “Rationally Evaluating Inconsistent Theories.” PHILOSOPHICA (GENT) 86 (2012): 83–99. Print.
@article{3063631,
  author       = {Weber, Erik and Van Dyck, Maarten},
  issn         = {0379-8402},
  journal      = {PHILOSOPHICA (GENT)},
  language     = {eng},
  pages        = {83--99},
  title        = {Rationally evaluating inconsistent theories},
  volume       = {86},
  year         = {2012},
}