Advanced search
1 file | 633.45 KB Add to list

Production and characterization of slow pyrolysis biochar: influence of feedstock type and pyrolysis conditions

Author
Organization
Project
Abstract
Biochar was produced by fixed-bed slow pyrolysis from various feedstock biomasses under a range of process conditions. Feedstocks used were pine wood, wheat straw, green waste and dried algae. Process conditions varied were the highest treatment temperature (HTT) and residence time. The produced chars were characterized by proximate analysis, CHN-elemental analysis, pH in solution, bomb calorimetry for higher heating value, N2 adsorption for BET surface area and two biological degradation assays (oxygen demand, carbon mineralization in soil). In proximate analysis, it was found that the fixed carbon content (expressed in wt% of dry and ash-free biochar) in the biochar samples strongly depended on the intensity of the thermal treatment (i.e. higher temperatures and longer residence times in the pyrolysis process). The actual yield in fixed carbon (i.e. the biochar fixed carbon content expressed as wt% of the dry and ash-free original feedstock biomass weight) was practically insensitive to the highest treatment temperature or residence time. The pH in solution, higher heating value and BET surface positively correlated with pyrolysis temperature. Finally, soil incubation tests showed that the addition of biochar to the soil initially marginally reduced the C-mineralization rate compared against the control soil samples, for which a possible explanation could be that the soil microbial community needs to adapt to the new conditions. This effect was more pronounced when adding chars with high fixed carbon content (resulting from more severe thermal treatment), as chars with low fixed carbon content (produced through mild thermal treatment) had a larger amount of volatile, more easily biodegradable, carbon compounds.
Keywords
biological degradation, biochar, characterization, feedstock, packed bed reactor, pyrolysis, pyrolysis conditions, slow pyrolysis, BLACK CARBON BIOCHAR, SOIL, BIOMASS, AMENDMENT, RELEASE, OIL

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 633.45 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Ronsse, Frederik, Sven Van Hecke, Dane Dickinson, et al. “Production and Characterization of Slow Pyrolysis Biochar: Influence of Feedstock Type and Pyrolysis Conditions.” GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY 5.2 (2013): 104–115. Print.
APA
Ronsse, Frederik, Van Hecke, S., Dickinson, D., & Prins, W. (2013). Production and characterization of slow pyrolysis biochar: influence of feedstock type and pyrolysis conditions. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 5(2), 104–115.
Chicago author-date
Ronsse, Frederik, Sven Van Hecke, Dane Dickinson, and Wolter Prins. 2013. “Production and Characterization of Slow Pyrolysis Biochar: Influence of Feedstock Type and Pyrolysis Conditions.” Global Change Biology Bioenergy 5 (2): 104–115.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Ronsse, Frederik, Sven Van Hecke, Dane Dickinson, and Wolter Prins. 2013. “Production and Characterization of Slow Pyrolysis Biochar: Influence of Feedstock Type and Pyrolysis Conditions.” Global Change Biology Bioenergy 5 (2): 104–115.
Vancouver
1.
Ronsse F, Van Hecke S, Dickinson D, Prins W. Production and characterization of slow pyrolysis biochar: influence of feedstock type and pyrolysis conditions. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY. 2013;5(2):104–15.
IEEE
[1]
F. Ronsse, S. Van Hecke, D. Dickinson, and W. Prins, “Production and characterization of slow pyrolysis biochar: influence of feedstock type and pyrolysis conditions,” GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 104–115, 2013.
@article{3030672,
  abstract     = {{Biochar was produced by fixed-bed slow pyrolysis from various feedstock biomasses under a range of process conditions. Feedstocks used were pine wood, wheat straw, green waste and dried algae. Process conditions varied were the highest treatment temperature (HTT) and residence time. The produced chars were characterized by proximate analysis, CHN-elemental analysis, pH in solution, bomb calorimetry for higher heating value, N2 adsorption for BET surface area and two biological degradation assays (oxygen demand, carbon mineralization in soil). In proximate analysis, it was found that the fixed carbon content (expressed in wt% of dry and ash-free biochar) in the biochar samples strongly depended on the intensity of the thermal treatment (i.e. higher temperatures and longer residence times in the pyrolysis process). The actual yield in fixed carbon (i.e. the biochar fixed carbon content expressed as wt% of the dry and ash-free original feedstock biomass weight) was practically insensitive to the highest treatment temperature or residence time. The pH in solution, higher heating value and BET surface positively correlated with pyrolysis temperature. Finally, soil incubation tests showed that the addition of biochar to the soil initially marginally reduced the C-mineralization rate compared against the control soil samples, for which a possible explanation could be that the soil microbial community needs to adapt to the new conditions. This effect was more pronounced when adding chars with high fixed carbon content (resulting from more severe thermal treatment), as chars with low fixed carbon content (produced through mild thermal treatment) had a larger amount of volatile, more easily biodegradable, carbon compounds.}},
  author       = {{Ronsse, Frederik and Van Hecke, Sven and Dickinson, Dane and Prins, Wolter}},
  issn         = {{1757-1693}},
  journal      = {{GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY}},
  keywords     = {{biological degradation,biochar,characterization,feedstock,packed bed reactor,pyrolysis,pyrolysis conditions,slow pyrolysis,BLACK CARBON BIOCHAR,SOIL,BIOMASS,AMENDMENT,RELEASE,OIL}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{104--115}},
  title        = {{Production and characterization of slow pyrolysis biochar: influence of feedstock type and pyrolysis conditions}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12018}},
  volume       = {{5}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: