Advanced search
1 file | 186.32 KB Add to list

Scheduled maintenance: Publication downloads temporarily unavailable.

Due to maintenance publication downloads will not be available on:

  • Wednesday, March 27, 17:00 – 21:00
  • Thursday, March 28, 17:00 – 21:00

Exports of lists, FWO and BOF information will remain available.

For any questions, please contact biblio@ugent.be. Apologies for any inconveniences, and thank you for your understanding.

Challenging global neoliberalism?: the global political economy of China's capital controls

Mattias Vermeiren (UGent) and Sacha Dierckx (UGent)
(2012) THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY. 33(9). p.1647-1668
Author
Organization
Abstract
This article engages with critical IPE scholars who have examined the rise of China and its impact on the neoliberal world order by analysing whether China poses a challenge to the neoliberal norm of free movement of capital. We argue that China’s capital control regime is marked by a contradiction between its domestic social relations of production and its global geo-economic ambitions. On the one hand, the key raison d’être of China’s capital controls is to protect and consolidate an investment-led accumulation regime that redistributes income and wealth from Chinese workers to its state-owned enterprise sector. Dismantling these controls would result in changing social relations of production that would not necessarily benefit Chinese industrial and financial capital. On the other hand, China’s accumulation regime has found itself increasingly constrained by the dynamics of US monetary hegemony, making the contestation of US structural monetary power a key global geo-economic ambition of China’s ruling elites. In this regard, China would have to challenge the dominance of the US dollar by promoting the international role of the renminbi and developing liquid financial markets. Since China would have to abolish its capital controls in order to achieve this, there is a plain contradiction between its domestic and global objectives. A good understanding of this contradiction is necessary in order to be able to assess whether China will be capable of challenging the neoliberal world order in general and the norm of free movement of capital in particular.
Keywords
international political economy, China, capital controls, CRISIS, MODEL, POWER, WORLD, TRANSFORMATION, GLOBALIZATION, PERSPECTIVE, SOCIALISM, TRANSITION, SYSTEM

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 186.32 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Vermeiren, Mattias, and Sacha Dierckx. “Challenging Global Neoliberalism?: The Global Political Economy of China’s Capital Controls.” THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY, vol. 33, no. 9, 2012, pp. 1647–68, doi:10.1080/01436597.2012.720841.
APA
Vermeiren, M., & Dierckx, S. (2012). Challenging global neoliberalism?: the global political economy of China’s capital controls. THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY, 33(9), 1647–1668. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2012.720841
Chicago author-date
Vermeiren, Mattias, and Sacha Dierckx. 2012. “Challenging Global Neoliberalism?: The Global Political Economy of China’s Capital Controls.” THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY 33 (9): 1647–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2012.720841.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Vermeiren, Mattias, and Sacha Dierckx. 2012. “Challenging Global Neoliberalism?: The Global Political Economy of China’s Capital Controls.” THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY 33 (9): 1647–1668. doi:10.1080/01436597.2012.720841.
Vancouver
1.
Vermeiren M, Dierckx S. Challenging global neoliberalism?: the global political economy of China’s capital controls. THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY. 2012;33(9):1647–68.
IEEE
[1]
M. Vermeiren and S. Dierckx, “Challenging global neoliberalism?: the global political economy of China’s capital controls,” THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 1647–1668, 2012.
@article{2971100,
  abstract     = {{This article engages with critical IPE scholars who have examined the rise of China and its impact on the neoliberal world order by analysing whether China poses a challenge to the neoliberal norm of free movement of capital. We argue that China’s capital control regime is marked by a contradiction between its domestic social relations of production and its global geo-economic ambitions. On the one hand, the key raison d’être of China’s capital controls is to protect and consolidate an investment-led accumulation regime that redistributes income and wealth from Chinese workers to its state-owned enterprise sector. Dismantling these controls would result in changing social relations of production that would not necessarily benefit Chinese industrial and financial capital. On the other hand, China’s accumulation regime has found itself increasingly constrained by the dynamics of US monetary hegemony, making the contestation of US structural monetary power a key global geo-economic ambition of China’s ruling elites. In this regard, China would have to challenge the dominance of the US dollar by promoting the international role of the renminbi and developing liquid financial markets. Since China would have to abolish its capital controls in order to achieve this, there is a plain contradiction between its domestic and global objectives. A good understanding of this contradiction is necessary in order to be able to assess whether China will be capable of challenging the neoliberal world order in general and the norm of free movement of capital in particular.}},
  author       = {{Vermeiren, Mattias and Dierckx, Sacha}},
  issn         = {{0143-6597}},
  journal      = {{THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY}},
  keywords     = {{international political economy,China,capital controls,CRISIS,MODEL,POWER,WORLD,TRANSFORMATION,GLOBALIZATION,PERSPECTIVE,SOCIALISM,TRANSITION,SYSTEM}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{9}},
  pages        = {{1647--1668}},
  title        = {{Challenging global neoliberalism?: the global political economy of China's capital controls}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2012.720841}},
  volume       = {{33}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: