Advanced search
1 file | 14.46 MB Add to list

Development aid to water management in Mali: the actors, 'global' paradigms, and 'local' translations

Jan Cherlet (UGent)
(2012)
Author
Promoter
(UGent)
Organization
Abstract
Development aid involves a complex network of numerous and extremely heterogeneous actors. Nevertheless, all actors seem to speak the same ‘development jargon’ and to display a congruence that extends from the donor over the professional consultant to the village chief. And although the ideas about what counts as ‘good’ and ‘bad’ aid have constantly changed over time —with new paradigms and policies sprouting every few years— the apparent congruence between actors more or less remains unchanged. How can this be explained? Is it a strategy of all actors to get into the pocket of the donor, or are the social dynamics in development aid more complex? When a new development paradigm appears, where does it come from and how does it gain support? Is this support really homogeneous? To answer the questions, a multi-sited ethnography was conducted in the sector of water-related development aid, with a focus on 3 paradigms that are currently hegemonic in this sector: Integrated Water Resources Management, Capacity Building, and Adaptation to Climate Change. The sites of inquiry were: the headquarters of a multilateral organization, the headquarters of a development NGO, and the Inner Niger Delta in Mali. The research shows that paradigm shifts do not happen overnight but that new paradigms have long lines of descent. Moreover, they require a lot of work from actors in order to become hegemonic; the actors need to create a tight network of support. Each actor, however, interprets the paradigms in a slightly different way, depending on the position in the network. They implant their own interests in their interpretation of the paradigm (the actors ‘translate’ their interests), regardless of whether they constitute the donor, a mediator, or the aid recipient. These translations are necessary to cement and reproduce the network.
Keywords
Actor-Network Theory, Integrated Water Resources Management, Capacity Building, Multi-sited Ethnography, Inner Niger Delta

Downloads

  • CHERLET 2012 Development Aid to Water Management in Mali FINAL.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 14.46 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Cherlet, Jan. Development Aid to Water Management in Mali: The Actors, “global” Paradigms, and “Local” Translations. Ghent University, Department of Third world studies, 2012.
APA
Cherlet, J. (2012). Development aid to water management in Mali: the actors, “global” paradigms, and “local” translations. Ghent University, Department of Third world studies, Ghent, Belgium.
Chicago author-date
Cherlet, Jan. 2012. “Development Aid to Water Management in Mali: The Actors, ‘global’ Paradigms, and ‘Local’ Translations.” Ghent, Belgium: Ghent University, Department of Third world studies.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Cherlet, Jan. 2012. “Development Aid to Water Management in Mali: The Actors, ‘global’ Paradigms, and ‘Local’ Translations.” Ghent, Belgium: Ghent University, Department of Third world studies.
Vancouver
1.
Cherlet J. Development aid to water management in Mali: the actors, “global” paradigms, and “local” translations. [Ghent, Belgium]: Ghent University, Department of Third world studies; 2012.
IEEE
[1]
J. Cherlet, “Development aid to water management in Mali: the actors, ‘global’ paradigms, and ‘local’ translations,” Ghent University, Department of Third world studies, Ghent, Belgium, 2012.
@phdthesis{2964760,
  abstract     = {{Development aid involves a complex network of numerous and extremely heterogeneous actors. Nevertheless, all actors seem to speak the same ‘development jargon’ and to display a congruence that extends from the donor over the professional consultant to the village chief. And although the ideas about what counts as ‘good’ and ‘bad’ aid have constantly changed over time —with new paradigms and policies sprouting every few years— the apparent congruence between actors more or less remains unchanged. How can this be explained? Is it a strategy of all actors to get into the pocket of the donor, or are the social dynamics in development aid more complex? When a new development paradigm appears, where does it come from and how does it gain support? Is this support really homogeneous? To answer the questions, a multi-sited ethnography was conducted in the sector of water-related development aid, with a focus on 3 paradigms that are currently hegemonic in this sector: Integrated Water Resources Management, Capacity Building, and Adaptation to Climate Change. The sites of inquiry were: the headquarters of a multilateral organization, the headquarters of a development NGO, and the Inner Niger Delta in Mali. The research shows that paradigm shifts do not happen overnight but that new paradigms have long lines of descent. Moreover, they require a lot of work from actors in order to become hegemonic; the actors need to create a tight network of support. Each actor, however, interprets the paradigms in a slightly different way, depending on the position in the network. They implant their own interests in their interpretation of the paradigm (the actors ‘translate’ their interests), regardless of whether they constitute the donor, a mediator, or the aid recipient. These translations are necessary to cement and reproduce the network.}},
  author       = {{Cherlet, Jan}},
  keywords     = {{Actor-Network Theory,Integrated Water Resources Management,Capacity Building,Multi-sited Ethnography,Inner Niger Delta}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{XXII, 272}},
  publisher    = {{Ghent University, Department of Third world studies}},
  school       = {{Ghent University}},
  title        = {{Development aid to water management in Mali: the actors, 'global' paradigms, and 'local' translations}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}