Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Can Pyrrhonists act normally?

Jan Willem Wieland UGent (2012) PHILOSOPHICAL EXPLORATIONS. 15(3). p.227-289
abstract
Pyrrhonism is the view that we should suspend all our beliefs in order to be rational and reach peace of mind. One of the main objections against this view is that it makes action impossible. One cannot suspend all beliefs and act normally at once. Yet, the question is: What is it about actions that they require beliefs? This issue has hardly been clarified in the literature. This is a bad situation, for if the objection fails and it turns out that the Pyrrhonists found a way to secure peace of mind, we better know the details. In the following I take up this systematic query, and show how the objection can be made precise. Despite Sextus Empiricus' ingenious appearance/reality distinction, which is to insure Pyrrhonism in this, I eventually argue that a life by appearances is quite unlike a normal life.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
Pyrrhonism, appearance, action, belief, intention, scepticism, TRANQUILLITY, ATARAXIA, REASONS
journal title
PHILOSOPHICAL EXPLORATIONS
Philos. Explor.
volume
15
issue
3
pages
227 - 289
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000308037000003
ISSN
1386-9795
DOI
10.1080/13869795.2012.696133
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
2964109
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-2964109
date created
2012-07-24 15:55:25
date last changed
2014-04-17 15:51:11
@article{2964109,
  abstract     = {Pyrrhonism is the view that we should suspend all our beliefs in order to be rational and reach peace of mind. One of the main objections against this view is that it makes action impossible. One cannot suspend all beliefs and act normally at once. Yet, the question is: What is it about actions that they require beliefs? This issue has hardly been clarified in the literature. This is a bad situation, for if the objection fails and it turns out that the Pyrrhonists found a way to secure peace of mind, we better know the details. In the following I take up this systematic query, and show how the objection can be made precise. Despite Sextus Empiricus' ingenious appearance/reality distinction, which is to insure Pyrrhonism in this, I eventually argue that a life by appearances is quite unlike a normal life.},
  author       = {Wieland, Jan Willem},
  issn         = {1386-9795},
  journal      = {PHILOSOPHICAL EXPLORATIONS},
  keyword      = {Pyrrhonism,appearance,action,belief,intention,scepticism,TRANQUILLITY,ATARAXIA,REASONS},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {3},
  pages        = {227--289},
  title        = {Can Pyrrhonists act normally?},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2012.696133},
  volume       = {15},
  year         = {2012},
}

Chicago
Wieland, Jan Willem. 2012. “Can Pyrrhonists Act Normally?” Philosophical Explorations 15 (3): 227–289.
APA
Wieland, J. W. (2012). Can Pyrrhonists act normally? PHILOSOPHICAL EXPLORATIONS, 15(3), 227–289.
Vancouver
1.
Wieland JW. Can Pyrrhonists act normally? PHILOSOPHICAL EXPLORATIONS. 2012;15(3):227–89.
MLA
Wieland, Jan Willem. “Can Pyrrhonists Act Normally?” PHILOSOPHICAL EXPLORATIONS 15.3 (2012): 227–289. Print.