Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

RCTs best for evidence on wound care: fact or fiction?

Dimitri Beeckman UGent and Ann Van Hecke UGent (2012) BRITISH JOURNAL OF NURSING. 20(12). p.3-3
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
misc (editorialMaterial)
publication status
published
subject
in
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NURSING
Br. J. Nurs.
volume
20
issue
12
pages
3 - 3
ISSN
0966-0461
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
V
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
2913428
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-2913428
date created
2012-06-20 12:45:07
date last changed
2012-06-25 08:51:32
@misc{2913428,
  author       = {Beeckman, Dimitri and Van Hecke, Ann},
  issn         = {0966-0461},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {12},
  pages        = {3--3},
  series       = {BRITISH JOURNAL OF NURSING},
  title        = {RCTs best for evidence on wound care: fact or fiction?},
  volume       = {20},
  year         = {2012},
}

Chicago
Beeckman, Dimitri, and Ann Van Hecke. 2012. “RCTs Best for Evidence on Wound Care: Fact or Fiction?” British Journal of Nursing.
APA
Beeckman, Dimitri, & Van Hecke, A. (2012). RCTs best for evidence on wound care: fact or fiction? BRITISH JOURNAL OF NURSING.
Vancouver
1.
Beeckman D, Van Hecke A. RCTs best for evidence on wound care: fact or fiction? BRITISH JOURNAL OF NURSING. 2012. p. 3–3.
MLA
Beeckman, Dimitri, and Ann Van Hecke. “RCTs Best for Evidence on Wound Care: Fact or Fiction?” BRITISH JOURNAL OF NURSING 2012 : 3–3. Print.