Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Predictors of spoken language development following pediatric cochlear implantation

Tinne Boons, Jan PL Brokx, Ingeborg Dhooge UGent, Johan HM Frijns, Louis Peeraer, Anneke Vermeulen, Jan Wouters and Astrid van Wieringen (2012) EAR AND HEARING. 33(5). p.627-639
abstract
Objectives: Although deaf children with cochlear implants (CIs) are able to develop good language skills, the large variability in outcomes remains a significant concern. The first aim of this study was to evaluate language skills in children with CIs to establish benchmarks. The second aim was to make an estimation of the optimal age at implantation to provide maximal opportunities for the child to achieve good language skills afterward. The third aim was to gain more insight into the causes of variability to set recommendations for optimizing the rehabilitation process of prelingually deaf children with CIs. Design: Receptive and expressive language development of 288 children who received CIs by age five was analyzed in a retrospective multicenter study. Outcome measures were language quotients (LQs) on the Reynell Developmental Language Scales and Schlichting Expressive Language Test at 1, 2, and 3 years after implantation. Independent predictive variables were nine child-related, environmental, and auditory factors. A series of multiple regression analyses determined the amount of variance in expressive and receptive language outcomes attributable to each predictor when controlling for the other variables. Results: Simple linear regressions with age at first fitting and independent samples t tests demonstrated that children implanted before the age of two performed significantly better on all tests than children who were implanted at an older age. The mean LQ was 0.78 with an SD of 0.18. A child with an LQ lower than 0.60 (= 0.78-0.18) within 3 years after implantation was labeled as a weak performer compared with other deaf children implanted before the age of two. Contralateral stimulation with a second CI or a hearing aid and the absence of additional disabilities were related to better language outcomes. The effect of environmental factors, comprising multilingualism, parental involvement, and communication mode increased over time. Three years after implantation, the total multiple regression model accounted for 52% of the variance in receptive language scores and 58% of the variance in expressive language scores. Conclusions: On the basis of language test scores of this large group of children, an LQ of 0.60 or lower was considered a risk criterion for problematic language development compared with other deaf children using CIs. Children attaining LQs below 0.60 should be monitored more closely and perhaps their rehabilitation programs should be reconsidered. Improved language outcomes were related to implantation under the age of two, contralateral stimulation, monolingualism, sufficient involvement of the parents, and oral communication by the parents. The presence of an additional learning disability had a negative influence on language development. Understanding these causes of variation can help clinicians and parents to create the best possible circumstances for children with CIs to acquire language.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
HEARING-IMPAIRED CHILDREN, EXPRESSIVE LANGUAGE, PRELINGUALLY DEAF-CHILDREN, SPEECH-PERCEPTION, AGE, OUTCOMES, BENEFITS, SKILLS, COMMUNICATION, VOCABULARY
journal title
EAR AND HEARING
Ear Hear.
volume
33
issue
5
pages
627 - 639
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000308353700008
JCR category
OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
JCR impact factor
3.262 (2012)
JCR rank
1/43 (2012)
JCR quartile
1 (2012)
ISSN
0196-0202
DOI
10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182503e47
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
2141156
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-2141156
date created
2012-06-12 22:11:44
date last changed
2016-12-19 15:42:06
@article{2141156,
  abstract     = {Objectives: Although deaf children with cochlear implants (CIs) are able to develop good language skills, the large variability in outcomes remains a significant concern. The first aim of this study was to evaluate language skills in children with CIs to establish benchmarks. The second aim was to make an estimation of the optimal age at implantation to provide maximal opportunities for the child to achieve good language skills afterward. The third aim was to gain more insight into the causes of variability to set recommendations for optimizing the rehabilitation process of prelingually deaf children with CIs. 
Design: Receptive and expressive language development of 288 children who received CIs by age five was analyzed in a retrospective multicenter study. Outcome measures were language quotients (LQs) on the Reynell Developmental Language Scales and Schlichting Expressive Language Test at 1, 2, and 3 years after implantation. Independent predictive variables were nine child-related, environmental, and auditory factors. A series of multiple regression analyses determined the amount of variance in expressive and receptive language outcomes attributable to each predictor when controlling for the other variables. 
Results: Simple linear regressions with age at first fitting and independent samples t tests demonstrated that children implanted before the age of two performed significantly better on all tests than children who were implanted at an older age. The mean LQ was 0.78 with an SD of 0.18. A child with an LQ lower than 0.60 (= 0.78-0.18) within 3 years after implantation was labeled as a weak performer compared with other deaf children implanted before the age of two. Contralateral stimulation with a second CI or a hearing aid and the absence of additional disabilities were related to better language outcomes. The effect of environmental factors, comprising multilingualism, parental involvement, and communication mode increased over time. Three years after implantation, the total multiple regression model accounted for 52\% of the variance in receptive language scores and 58\% of the variance in expressive language scores. 
Conclusions: On the basis of language test scores of this large group of children, an LQ of 0.60 or lower was considered a risk criterion for problematic language development compared with other deaf children using CIs. Children attaining LQs below 0.60 should be monitored more closely and perhaps their rehabilitation programs should be reconsidered. Improved language outcomes were related to implantation under the age of two, contralateral stimulation, monolingualism, sufficient involvement of the parents, and oral communication by the parents. The presence of an additional learning disability had a negative influence on language development. Understanding these causes of variation can help clinicians and parents to create the best possible circumstances for children with CIs to acquire language.},
  author       = {Boons, Tinne and Brokx, Jan PL and Dhooge, Ingeborg and Frijns, Johan HM and Peeraer, Louis and Vermeulen, Anneke and Wouters, Jan and van Wieringen, Astrid},
  issn         = {0196-0202},
  journal      = {EAR AND HEARING},
  keyword      = {HEARING-IMPAIRED CHILDREN,EXPRESSIVE LANGUAGE,PRELINGUALLY DEAF-CHILDREN,SPEECH-PERCEPTION,AGE,OUTCOMES,BENEFITS,SKILLS,COMMUNICATION,VOCABULARY},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {5},
  pages        = {627--639},
  title        = {Predictors of spoken language development following pediatric cochlear implantation},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182503e47},
  volume       = {33},
  year         = {2012},
}

Chicago
Boons, Tinne, Jan PL Brokx, Ingeborg Dhooge, Johan HM Frijns, Louis Peeraer, Anneke Vermeulen, Jan Wouters, and Astrid van Wieringen. 2012. “Predictors of Spoken Language Development Following Pediatric Cochlear Implantation.” Ear and Hearing 33 (5): 627–639.
APA
Boons, T., Brokx, J. P., Dhooge, I., Frijns, J. H., Peeraer, L., Vermeulen, A., Wouters, J., et al. (2012). Predictors of spoken language development following pediatric cochlear implantation. EAR AND HEARING, 33(5), 627–639.
Vancouver
1.
Boons T, Brokx JP, Dhooge I, Frijns JH, Peeraer L, Vermeulen A, et al. Predictors of spoken language development following pediatric cochlear implantation. EAR AND HEARING. 2012;33(5):627–39.
MLA
Boons, Tinne, Jan PL Brokx, Ingeborg Dhooge, et al. “Predictors of Spoken Language Development Following Pediatric Cochlear Implantation.” EAR AND HEARING 33.5 (2012): 627–639. Print.