Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Trend analysis of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from Belgian pork and poultry meat products using surveillance data of 2004-2009

Wesley Mattheus, Nadine Botteldoorn, Kim Heylen UGent, Brigitte Pochet and Katelijne Dierick (2012) FOODBORNE PATHOGENS AND DISEASE. 9(5). p.465-472
abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp. isolated from pork and poultry carcasses and pork and poultry meat(at slaughterhouse level, during meat cutting and at retail) in Belgium, using available surveillance data over the period 2004-2009. The susceptibilities of 1724 Campylobacter isolates for ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid, tetracycline, erythromycin and gentamicin were tested by E-test. Gentamicin resistance was low (near 0%) till 2007, with an increase to over 20% by 2009 for all species-matrix combinations. Resistance to tetracycline fluctuated around the same level during the entire study period and was significantly higher (p-value <0.05) in C. coli than in C. jejuni. Erythromycin resistance was low and showed a slight decrease between 2004 and 2007, but increased from 2007 till 2009. Fluoroquinolone and ampicillin resistance was significantly higher in isolates derived from poultry, compared to pork-related isolates. This correlates with the higher use of these antimicrobials in poultry husbandry. With one out of four, C. coli from poultry showed the most apparent multiresistance (resistance to four or more antimicrobials). Approximately 1% of the poultry-derived isolates (both C. coli and C. jejuni) showed resistance to all tested antimicrobials, while none was found in pork products
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
ESCHERICHIA-COLI, DNA-SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PCR ASSAY, FLUOROQUINOLONE RESISTANCE, GENTAMICIN RESISTANCE, ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE, MACROLIDE RESISTANCE, GYRA MUTATIONS, EFFLUX PUMP, MAMA-PCR
journal title
FOODBORNE PATHOGENS AND DISEASE
Foodborne Pathog. Dis.
volume
9
issue
5
pages
465 - 472
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000303595800012
JCR category
FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
JCR impact factor
2.283 (2012)
JCR rank
28/123 (2012)
JCR quartile
1 (2012)
ISSN
1535-3141
DOI
10.1089/fpd.2011.1042
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
2116388
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-2116388
date created
2012-05-29 09:22:16
date last changed
2012-06-04 11:54:50
@article{2116388,
  abstract     = {The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp. isolated from pork and poultry carcasses and pork and poultry meat(at slaughterhouse level, during meat cutting and at retail) in Belgium, using available surveillance data over the period 2004-2009. The susceptibilities of 1724 Campylobacter isolates for ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid, tetracycline, erythromycin and gentamicin were tested by E-test. Gentamicin resistance was low (near 0\%) till 2007, with an increase to over 20\% by 2009 for all species-matrix combinations. Resistance to tetracycline fluctuated around the same level during the entire study period and was significantly higher (p-value {\textlangle}0.05) in C. coli than in C. jejuni. Erythromycin resistance was low and showed a slight decrease between 2004 and 2007, but increased from 2007 till 2009. Fluoroquinolone and ampicillin resistance was significantly higher in isolates derived from poultry, compared to pork-related isolates. This correlates with the higher use of these antimicrobials in poultry husbandry. With one out of four, C. coli from poultry showed the most apparent multiresistance (resistance to four or more antimicrobials). Approximately 1\% of the poultry-derived isolates (both C. coli and C. jejuni) showed resistance to all tested antimicrobials, while none was found in pork products},
  author       = {Mattheus, Wesley and Botteldoorn, Nadine and Heylen, Kim and Pochet, Brigitte and Dierick, Katelijne},
  issn         = {1535-3141},
  journal      = {FOODBORNE PATHOGENS AND DISEASE},
  keyword      = {ESCHERICHIA-COLI,DNA-SEQUENCE ANALYSIS,PCR ASSAY,FLUOROQUINOLONE RESISTANCE,GENTAMICIN RESISTANCE,ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE,MACROLIDE RESISTANCE,GYRA MUTATIONS,EFFLUX PUMP,MAMA-PCR},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {5},
  pages        = {465--472},
  title        = {Trend analysis of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from Belgian pork and poultry meat products using surveillance data of 2004-2009},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2011.1042},
  volume       = {9},
  year         = {2012},
}

Chicago
Mattheus, Wesley, Nadine Botteldoorn, Kim Heylen, Brigitte Pochet, and Katelijne Dierick. 2012. “Trend Analysis of Antimicrobial Resistance in Campylobacter Jejuni and Campylobacter Coli Isolated from Belgian Pork and Poultry Meat Products Using Surveillance Data of 2004-2009.” Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 9 (5): 465–472.
APA
Mattheus, W., Botteldoorn, N., Heylen, K., Pochet, B., & Dierick, K. (2012). Trend analysis of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from Belgian pork and poultry meat products using surveillance data of 2004-2009. FOODBORNE PATHOGENS AND DISEASE, 9(5), 465–472.
Vancouver
1.
Mattheus W, Botteldoorn N, Heylen K, Pochet B, Dierick K. Trend analysis of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from Belgian pork and poultry meat products using surveillance data of 2004-2009. FOODBORNE PATHOGENS AND DISEASE. 2012;9(5):465–72.
MLA
Mattheus, Wesley, Nadine Botteldoorn, Kim Heylen, et al. “Trend Analysis of Antimicrobial Resistance in Campylobacter Jejuni and Campylobacter Coli Isolated from Belgian Pork and Poultry Meat Products Using Surveillance Data of 2004-2009.” FOODBORNE PATHOGENS AND DISEASE 9.5 (2012): 465–472. Print.