Advanced search
1 file | 439.07 KB Add to list

Convergence analysis of two-level response and parameter mapping-based methods

Author
Organization
Abstract
Space mapping-based methodologies for optimization and inverse problems in low-and high-frequency electromagnetic applications are well-established. This methodology uses one or multiple low-fidelity models and a high-fidelity model. The objective is to shift the optimization or inverse problem that is carried out within the high-fidelity forward model to a space mapped coarse model, which acts as surrogate model. Convergence problems however may occur since convergence rates depend on the fidelity of the coarse model(s) compared to the fine model. The recently proposed two-level response and parameter mapping (RPM) method, which employs input and output mapping, shows some improved convergence properties. This article proposes a mathematical framework for determining the robustness of this RPM methodology. We express accuracy and speed up of the RPM-based procedures through the use of four different quality measures.
Keywords
optimization, convergence conditions, space mapping, inverse problems, response and parameter mapping, OPTIMIZATION, accuracy

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 439.07 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Crevecoeur, Guillaume. “Convergence Analysis of Two-Level Response and Parameter Mapping-Based Methods.” INVERSE PROBLEMS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, vol. 20, no. 1, 2012, pp. 105–15, doi:10.1080/17415977.2011.624623.
APA
Crevecoeur, G. (2012). Convergence analysis of two-level response and parameter mapping-based methods. INVERSE PROBLEMS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 20(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/17415977.2011.624623
Chicago author-date
Crevecoeur, Guillaume. 2012. “Convergence Analysis of Two-Level Response and Parameter Mapping-Based Methods.” INVERSE PROBLEMS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING 20 (1): 105–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17415977.2011.624623.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Crevecoeur, Guillaume. 2012. “Convergence Analysis of Two-Level Response and Parameter Mapping-Based Methods.” INVERSE PROBLEMS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING 20 (1): 105–115. doi:10.1080/17415977.2011.624623.
Vancouver
1.
Crevecoeur G. Convergence analysis of two-level response and parameter mapping-based methods. INVERSE PROBLEMS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. 2012;20(1):105–15.
IEEE
[1]
G. Crevecoeur, “Convergence analysis of two-level response and parameter mapping-based methods,” INVERSE PROBLEMS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 105–115, 2012.
@article{2116208,
  abstract     = {{Space mapping-based methodologies for optimization and inverse problems in low-and high-frequency electromagnetic applications are well-established. This methodology uses one or multiple low-fidelity models and a high-fidelity model. The objective is to shift the optimization or inverse problem that is carried out within the high-fidelity forward model to a space mapped coarse model, which acts as surrogate model. Convergence problems however may occur since convergence rates depend on the fidelity of the coarse model(s) compared to the fine model. The recently proposed two-level response and parameter mapping (RPM) method, which employs input and output mapping, shows some improved convergence properties. This article proposes a mathematical framework for determining the robustness of this RPM methodology. We express accuracy and speed up of the RPM-based procedures through the use of four different quality measures.}},
  author       = {{Crevecoeur, Guillaume}},
  issn         = {{1741-5977}},
  journal      = {{INVERSE PROBLEMS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING}},
  keywords     = {{optimization,convergence conditions,space mapping,inverse problems,response and parameter mapping,OPTIMIZATION,accuracy}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{105--115}},
  title        = {{Convergence analysis of two-level response and parameter mapping-based methods}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1080/17415977.2011.624623}},
  volume       = {{20}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: