Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

The Sulpicii from Puteoli and Usury in the early Roman empire

Koenraad Verboven UGent (2003) TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR RECHTSGESCHIEDENIS - REVUE D'HISTOIRE DU DROIT - THE LEGAL HISTORY REVIEW. 71(1-2). p.7-28
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
journal title
TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR RECHTSGESCHIEDENIS - REVUE D'HISTOIRE DU DROIT - THE LEGAL HISTORY REVIEW
Tijdschr. Rechtsgeschiedenis
volume
71
issue
1-2
pages
7-28 pages
ISSN
0040-7585
1571-8190
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A2
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
VABB id
c:vabb:191483
VABB type
VABB-1
id
209246
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-209246
date created
2004-04-07 14:24:00
date last changed
2016-12-19 15:38:01
@article{209246,
  author       = {Verboven, Koenraad},
  issn         = {0040-7585},
  journal      = {TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR RECHTSGESCHIEDENIS - REVUE D'HISTOIRE DU DROIT - THE LEGAL HISTORY REVIEW},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {1-2},
  pages        = {7--28},
  title        = {The Sulpicii from Puteoli and Usury in the early Roman empire},
  volume       = {71},
  year         = {2003},
}

Chicago
Verboven, Koenraad. 2003. “The Sulpicii from Puteoli and Usury in the Early Roman Empire.” TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR RECHTSGESCHIEDENIS - REVUE D’HISTOIRE DU DROIT - THE LEGAL HISTORY REVIEW 71 (1-2): 7–28.
APA
Verboven, Koenraad. (2003). The Sulpicii from Puteoli and Usury in the early Roman empire. TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR RECHTSGESCHIEDENIS - REVUE D’HISTOIRE DU DROIT - THE LEGAL HISTORY REVIEW, 71(1-2), 7–28.
Vancouver
1.
Verboven K. The Sulpicii from Puteoli and Usury in the early Roman empire. TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR RECHTSGESCHIEDENIS - REVUE D’HISTOIRE DU DROIT - THE LEGAL HISTORY REVIEW. 2003;71(1-2):7–28.
MLA
Verboven, Koenraad. “The Sulpicii from Puteoli and Usury in the Early Roman Empire.” TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR RECHTSGESCHIEDENIS - REVUE D’HISTOIRE DU DROIT - THE LEGAL HISTORY REVIEW 71.1-2 (2003): 7–28. Print.