Advanced search
1 file | 326.21 KB

Ambulatory arterial stiffness index does not accurately assess arterial stiffness

(2012) JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION. 30(3). p.574-580
Author
Organization
Abstract
Introduction: The ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI), derived from ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) recordings, has been proposed as a surrogate marker of arterial stiffness. However, there is controversy to what extent it reflects stiffness or is affected by other parameters. Using a previously validated one-dimensional computer model of the arterial circulation, the relative importance of the different determinants of the AASI was explored. Methods: Arterial distensibility (inverse of stiffness), peripheral resistance, heart rate, maximal cardiac elastance and venous filling pressure were varied from 80 to 120% of their initial value in steps of 10% to generate 3125 BP values, mimicking the daily fluctuations in one theoretical patient. From this dataset, we assessed the confidence with which AASI can be derived in this patient, as well as the influence of different individual parameters on AASI. To assess the ability of AASI to detect large changes in arterial stiffness, two additional patients were simulated with a distensibility of 50 and 25% of the default distensibility, respectively. Results: The distribution of AASI values, obtained from 10 000 ABPM simulations (each using 72 BP values randomly selected among 3125) was normal [AASI - 0.43 +/- 0.04 (SD)]. An increase in heart rate, distensibility or resistance from 80 to 120% of its default value caused the AASI to decrease by 37, 21 or 9%, respectively. Whereas there was no overlap in the distensibility ranges for the three theoretical patients, the amount of overlap between the AASI distributions was substantial. Conclusion: The confounding effects of vascular resistance and heart rate seriously limit the use of AASI as a marker of stiffness.
Keywords
ambulatory blood pressure, ambulatory arterial stiffness index, arterial stiffness, blood pressure, monitoring, BLOOD-PRESSURE-MEASUREMENTS, CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY, INDEPENDENT PREDICTOR, POPULATION

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 326.21 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Kips, Jan, SEBASTIAN VERMEERSCH, Philippe Reymond, Pierre Boutouyrie, Nikos Stergiopulos, Stephane Laurent, Lucas Van Bortel, and Patrick Segers. 2012. “Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index Does Not Accurately Assess Arterial Stiffness.” Journal of Hypertension 30 (3): 574–580.
APA
Kips, Jan, VERMEERSCH, S., Reymond, P., Boutouyrie, P., Stergiopulos, N., Laurent, S., Van Bortel, L., et al. (2012). Ambulatory arterial stiffness index does not accurately assess arterial stiffness. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 30(3), 574–580.
Vancouver
1.
Kips J, VERMEERSCH S, Reymond P, Boutouyrie P, Stergiopulos N, Laurent S, et al. Ambulatory arterial stiffness index does not accurately assess arterial stiffness. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION. 2012;30(3):574–80.
MLA
Kips, Jan, SEBASTIAN VERMEERSCH, Philippe Reymond, et al. “Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index Does Not Accurately Assess Arterial Stiffness.” JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION 30.3 (2012): 574–580. Print.
@article{2066772,
  abstract     = {Introduction: The ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI), derived from ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) recordings, has been proposed as a surrogate marker of arterial stiffness. However, there is controversy to what extent it reflects stiffness or is affected by other parameters. Using a previously validated one-dimensional computer model of the arterial circulation, the relative importance of the different determinants of the AASI was explored. 
Methods: Arterial distensibility (inverse of stiffness), peripheral resistance, heart rate, maximal cardiac elastance and venous filling pressure were varied from 80 to 120\% of their initial value in steps of 10\% to generate 3125 BP values, mimicking the daily fluctuations in one theoretical patient. From this dataset, we assessed the confidence with which AASI can be derived in this patient, as well as the influence of different individual parameters on AASI. To assess the ability of AASI to detect large changes in arterial stiffness, two additional patients were simulated with a distensibility of 50 and 25\% of the default distensibility, respectively. 
Results: The distribution of AASI values, obtained from 10 000 ABPM simulations (each using 72 BP values randomly selected among 3125) was normal [AASI - 0.43 +/- 0.04 (SD)]. An increase in heart rate, distensibility or resistance from 80 to 120\% of its default value caused the AASI to decrease by 37, 21 or 9\%, respectively. Whereas there was no overlap in the distensibility ranges for the three theoretical patients, the amount of overlap between the AASI distributions was substantial. 
Conclusion: The confounding effects of vascular resistance and heart rate seriously limit the use of AASI as a marker of stiffness.},
  author       = {Kips, Jan and VERMEERSCH, SEBASTIAN and Reymond, Philippe and Boutouyrie, Pierre and Stergiopulos, Nikos and Laurent, Stephane and Van Bortel, Lucas and Segers, Patrick},
  issn         = {0263-6352},
  journal      = {JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION},
  keyword      = {ambulatory blood pressure,ambulatory arterial stiffness index,arterial stiffness,blood pressure,monitoring,BLOOD-PRESSURE-MEASUREMENTS,CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY,INDEPENDENT PREDICTOR,POPULATION},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {3},
  pages        = {574--580},
  title        = {Ambulatory arterial stiffness index does not accurately assess arterial stiffness},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834fca18},
  volume       = {30},
  year         = {2012},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: