Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Trends in embryo disposition decisions: patients' responses to a 15-year mailing program

Veerle Provoost UGent, Guido Pennings UGent, Petra De Sutter UGent, A Van de Velde and MARC DHONT UGent (2012) HUMAN REPRODUCTION. 27(2). p.506-514
abstract
BACKGROUND: This study examined the responses of patients of a Belgian fertility center to mailed requests to make or renew an embryo disposition decision (EDD), over a period of 15 years, to investigate trends in the decisions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on a mailing program from 1992 to 2006, for patients, of the Department of Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital (Belgium), from whom embryos had been cryopreserved at least 2 years. RESULTS: In 15 years, 3840 EDD forms were prepared for 2334 couples or female patients. The number of forms increased from 21 in 1992 to 558 in 2006. Each year, around a third of the forms were not returned. In general, a quarter of patients who received more than one form never answered. Donation to others for reproduction was overall the least popular option and decreased over the years. The rising trend in decisions to discard reversed into a negative trend from the introduction of donation for science (1997). Since then, donation for science has been the most popular option and its popularity increased with time. In 15 years, 2504 embryos were donated for science. More than a quarter of the patients who chose more than one final EDD in different years did not select the same EDD the second time. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a positive trend in donation for science and a negative trend in donation to others and discarding. A substantial number of individual patients chose different types of EDDs in consecutive mailings, which shows that advance EDD directives should be used with caution.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
DONATION, POTENTIAL DONORS, FATE, ATTITUDES, STEM-CELL RESEARCH, CRYOPRESERVED HUMAN EMBRYOS, IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION, FROZEN EMBRYOS, COUPLES DECISIONS, PREFERENCES, embryo disposition, cryopreserved embryos, ethics, stem cell research, informed consent
journal title
HUMAN REPRODUCTION
Hum. Reprod.
volume
27
issue
2
pages
506 - 514
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000299131800025
JCR category
OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
JCR impact factor
4.67 (2012)
JCR rank
3/77 (2012)
JCR quartile
1 (2012)
ISSN
0268-1161
DOI
10.1093/humrep/der419
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
2049725
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-2049725
date created
2012-02-28 16:07:01
date last changed
2015-06-17 09:58:31
@article{2049725,
  abstract     = {BACKGROUND: This study examined the responses of patients of a Belgian fertility center to mailed requests to make or renew an embryo disposition decision (EDD), over a period of 15 years, to investigate trends in the decisions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on a mailing program from 1992 to 2006, for patients, of the Department of Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital (Belgium), from whom embryos had been cryopreserved at least 2 years. RESULTS: In 15 years, 3840 EDD forms were prepared for 2334 couples or female patients. The number of forms increased from 21 in 1992 to 558 in 2006. Each year, around a third of the forms were not returned. In general, a quarter of patients who received more than one form never answered. Donation to others for reproduction was overall the least popular option and decreased over the years. The rising trend in decisions to discard reversed into a negative trend from the introduction of donation for science (1997). Since then, donation for science has been the most popular option and its popularity increased with time. In 15 years, 2504 embryos were donated for science. More than a quarter of the patients who chose more than one final EDD in different years did not select the same EDD the second time. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a positive trend in donation for science and a negative trend in donation to others and discarding. A substantial number of individual patients chose different types of EDDs in consecutive mailings, which shows that advance EDD directives should be used with caution.},
  author       = {Provoost, Veerle and Pennings, Guido and De Sutter, Petra and Van de Velde, A and DHONT, MARC},
  issn         = {0268-1161},
  journal      = {HUMAN REPRODUCTION},
  keyword      = {DONATION,POTENTIAL DONORS,FATE,ATTITUDES,STEM-CELL RESEARCH,CRYOPRESERVED HUMAN EMBRYOS,IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION,FROZEN EMBRYOS,COUPLES DECISIONS,PREFERENCES,embryo disposition,cryopreserved embryos,ethics,stem cell research,informed consent},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {506--514},
  title        = {Trends in embryo disposition decisions: patients' responses to a 15-year mailing program},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der419},
  volume       = {27},
  year         = {2012},
}

Chicago
Provoost, Veerle, Guido Pennings, Petra De Sutter, A Van de Velde, and MARC DHONT. 2012. “Trends in Embryo Disposition Decisions: Patients’ Responses to a 15-year Mailing Program.” Human Reproduction 27 (2): 506–514.
APA
Provoost, Veerle, Pennings, G., De Sutter, P., Van de Velde, A., & DHONT, M. (2012). Trends in embryo disposition decisions: patients’ responses to a 15-year mailing program. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 27(2), 506–514.
Vancouver
1.
Provoost V, Pennings G, De Sutter P, Van de Velde A, DHONT M. Trends in embryo disposition decisions: patients’ responses to a 15-year mailing program. HUMAN REPRODUCTION. 2012;27(2):506–14.
MLA
Provoost, Veerle, Guido Pennings, Petra De Sutter, et al. “Trends in Embryo Disposition Decisions: Patients’ Responses to a 15-year Mailing Program.” HUMAN REPRODUCTION 27.2 (2012): 506–514. Print.