Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report?: suggestions from the COVER survey

Jan Bosmans UGent, Lieve Peremans, Arthur M De Schepper, Philippe Duyck and Paul M Parizel (2011) INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING. 2(5). p.577-584
abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate what referring clinicians suggest when asked how the quality of radiology reports can be improved. METHODS: At the end of the questionnaire of the COVER survey, a bi-national quantitative survey on the radiology report among referring physicians, clinical specialists and general practitioners were able to freely enter suggestions with regard to improving the quality of the report. These suggestions were isolated from the quantitative results. Subjects and themes were identified, examined, ordered, counted, compared and analysed. RESULTS: Of a total of 3,884 invitations to participate, we received 735 response forms from clinicians (18.9%), 233 (31.7%) of which contained suggestions. Issues mentioned most frequently were the need for clinical information and a clinical question, for a conclusion, structuring, communicating directly with the clinician, completeness, integrating images or referring to images, mentioning relevant findings outside of the clinical question, mentioning a diagnosis or suitable differential diagnosis, and concise reporting. CONCLUSION: Although these spontaneous suggestions are erratic and sometimes contradictory, they summarise the ideas as well as the emotions of these clients of the radiology department. Therefore it is advisable to take them into account when developing new ways of reporting.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
Radiology report, Reporting, Communication
journal title
INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING
Insights Imaging
volume
2
issue
5
pages
577 - 584
ISSN
1869-4101
DOI
10.1007/s13244-011-0118-z
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A2
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
2048460
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-2048460
date created
2012-02-28 11:56:53
date last changed
2018-01-26 12:03:25
@article{2048460,
  abstract     = {OBJECTIVE: To investigate what referring clinicians suggest when asked how the quality of radiology reports can be improved.
METHODS: At the end of the questionnaire of the COVER survey, a bi-national quantitative survey on the radiology report among referring physicians, clinical specialists and general practitioners were able to freely enter suggestions with regard to improving the quality of the report. These suggestions were isolated from the quantitative results. Subjects and themes were identified, examined, ordered, counted, compared and analysed.
RESULTS: Of a total of 3,884 invitations to participate, we received 735 response forms from clinicians (18.9\%), 233 (31.7\%) of which contained suggestions. Issues mentioned most frequently were the need for clinical information and a clinical question, for a conclusion, structuring, communicating directly with the clinician, completeness, integrating images or referring to images, mentioning relevant findings outside of the clinical question, mentioning a diagnosis or suitable differential diagnosis, and concise reporting.
CONCLUSION: Although these spontaneous suggestions are erratic and sometimes contradictory, they summarise the ideas as well as the emotions of these clients of the radiology department. Therefore it is advisable to take them into account when developing new ways of reporting.},
  author       = {Bosmans, Jan and Peremans, Lieve and De Schepper, Arthur M and Duyck, Philippe and Parizel, Paul M},
  issn         = {1869-4101},
  journal      = {INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING},
  keyword      = {Radiology report,Reporting,Communication},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {5},
  pages        = {577--584},
  title        = {How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report?: suggestions from the COVER survey},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0118-z},
  volume       = {2},
  year         = {2011},
}

Chicago
Bosmans, Jan, Lieve Peremans, Arthur M De Schepper, Philippe Duyck, and Paul M Parizel. 2011. “How Do Referring Clinicians Want Radiologists to Report?: Suggestions from the COVER Survey.” Insights into Imaging 2 (5): 577–584.
APA
Bosmans, J., Peremans, L., De Schepper, A. M., Duyck, P., & Parizel, P. M. (2011). How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report?: suggestions from the COVER survey. INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2(5), 577–584.
Vancouver
1.
Bosmans J, Peremans L, De Schepper AM, Duyck P, Parizel PM. How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report?: suggestions from the COVER survey. INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING. 2011;2(5):577–84.
MLA
Bosmans, Jan, Lieve Peremans, Arthur M De Schepper, et al. “How Do Referring Clinicians Want Radiologists to Report?: Suggestions from the COVER Survey.” INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING 2.5 (2011): 577–584. Print.