Advanced search
1 file | 410.40 KB Add to list

Perceptions of appropriateness of care among European and Israeli intensive care unit nurses and physicians

Author
Organization
Abstract
Context Clinicians in intensive care units (ICUs) who perceive the care they provide as inappropriate experience moral distress and are at risk for burnout. This situation may jeopardize patient quality of care and increase staff turnover. Objective To determine the prevalence of perceived inappropriateness of care among ICU clinicians and to identify patient-related situations, personal characteristics, and work-related characteristics associated with perceived inappropriateness of care. Design, Setting, and Participants Cross-sectional evaluation on May 11, 2010, of 82 adult ICUs in 9 European countries and Israel. Participants were 1953 ICU nurses and physicians providing bedside care. Main Outcome Measure Perceived inappropriateness of care, defined as a specific patient-care situation in which the clinician acts in a manner contrary to his or her personal and professional beliefs, as assessed using a questionnaire designed for the study. Results Of 1651 respondents (median response rate, 93% overall; interquartile range, 82%-100% [medians 93% among nurses and 100% among physicians]), perceived inappropriateness of care in at least 1 patient was reported by 439 clinicians overall (27%; 95% CI, 24%-29%), 300 of 1218 were nurses (25%), 132 of 407 were physicians (32%), and 26 had missing answers describing job title. Of these 439 individuals, 397 reported 445 situations associated with perceived inappropriateness of care. The most common reports were perceived disproportionate care (290 situations [65%; 95% CI, 58%-73%], of which "too much care" was reported in 89% of situations, followed by "other patients would benefit more" (168 situations [38%; 95% CI, 32%-43%]). Independently associated with perceived inappropriateness of care rates both among nurses and physicians were symptom control decisions directed by physicians only (odds ratio [OR], 1.73; 95% CI, 1.17-2.56; P=.006); involvement of nurses in end-of-life decision making (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60-0.96; P=.02); good collaboration between nurses and physicians (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.92; P=.009); and freedom to decide how to perform work-related tasks (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.89; P=.002); while a high perceived workload was significantly associated among nurses only(OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.07-2.06; P=.02). Perceived inappropriateness of care was independently associated with higher intent to leave a job (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.04-2.63; P=.03). In the subset of 69 ICUs for which patient data could be linked, clinicians reported received inappropriateness of care in 207 patients, representing 23% (95% CI, 20%-27%) of 883 ICU beds. Conclusion Among a group of European and Israeli ICU clinicians, perceptions of inappropriate care were frequently reported and were inversely associated with factors indicating good teamwork.
Keywords
COMMUNICATION, BURNOUT, DECISIONS, END, FUTILE CARE, NURSING STAFF, CRITICALLY-ILL, ETHICAL DILEMMAS, MORAL DISTRESS, OF-LIFE CARE

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 410.40 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Piers, Ruth, Elie Azoulay, Bara Ricou, et al. “Perceptions of Appropriateness of Care Among European and Israeli Intensive Care Unit Nurses and Physicians.” JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 306.24 (2011): 2694–2703. Print.
APA
Piers, R., Azoulay, E., Ricou, B., Ganz, F. D., Decruyenaere, J., Max, A., Michalsen, A., et al. (2011). Perceptions of appropriateness of care among European and Israeli intensive care unit nurses and physicians. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 306(24), 2694–2703.
Chicago author-date
Piers, Ruth, Elie Azoulay, Bara Ricou, Freda DeKeyser Ganz, Johan Decruyenaere, Adeline Max, Andrej Michalsen, et al. 2011. “Perceptions of Appropriateness of Care Among European and Israeli Intensive Care Unit Nurses and Physicians.” Jama-journal of the American Medical Association 306 (24): 2694–2703.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Piers, Ruth, Elie Azoulay, Bara Ricou, Freda DeKeyser Ganz, Johan Decruyenaere, Adeline Max, Andrej Michalsen, Paulo Azevedo Maia, Radoslaw Owczuk, Francesca Rubulotta, Pieter Depuydt, Anne-Pascale Meert, Anna K Reyners, Andrew Aquilina, Maarten Bekaert, Nele Van Den Noortgate, Wim J Schrauwen, and Dominique Benoit. 2011. “Perceptions of Appropriateness of Care Among European and Israeli Intensive Care Unit Nurses and Physicians.” Jama-journal of the American Medical Association 306 (24): 2694–2703.
Vancouver
1.
Piers R, Azoulay E, Ricou B, Ganz FD, Decruyenaere J, Max A, et al. Perceptions of appropriateness of care among European and Israeli intensive care unit nurses and physicians. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION. 2011;306(24):2694–703.
IEEE
[1]
R. Piers et al., “Perceptions of appropriateness of care among European and Israeli intensive care unit nurses and physicians,” JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, vol. 306, no. 24, pp. 2694–2703, 2011.
@article{2048424,
  abstract     = {Context Clinicians in intensive care units (ICUs) who perceive the care they provide as inappropriate experience moral distress and are at risk for burnout. This situation may jeopardize patient quality of care and increase staff turnover. 
Objective To determine the prevalence of perceived inappropriateness of care among ICU clinicians and to identify patient-related situations, personal characteristics, and work-related characteristics associated with perceived inappropriateness of care. 
Design, Setting, and Participants Cross-sectional evaluation on May 11, 2010, of 82 adult ICUs in 9 European countries and Israel. Participants were 1953 ICU nurses and physicians providing bedside care. 
Main Outcome Measure Perceived inappropriateness of care, defined as a specific patient-care situation in which the clinician acts in a manner contrary to his or her personal and professional beliefs, as assessed using a questionnaire designed for the study. 
Results Of 1651 respondents (median response rate, 93% overall; interquartile range, 82%-100% [medians 93% among nurses and 100% among physicians]), perceived inappropriateness of care in at least 1 patient was reported by 439 clinicians overall (27%; 95% CI, 24%-29%), 300 of 1218 were nurses (25%), 132 of 407 were physicians (32%), and 26 had missing answers describing job title. Of these 439 individuals, 397 reported 445 situations associated with perceived inappropriateness of care. The most common reports were perceived disproportionate care (290 situations [65%; 95% CI, 58%-73%], of which "too much care" was reported in 89% of situations, followed by "other patients would benefit more" (168 situations [38%; 95% CI, 32%-43%]). Independently associated with perceived inappropriateness of care rates both among nurses and physicians were symptom control decisions directed by physicians only (odds ratio [OR], 1.73; 95% CI, 1.17-2.56; P=.006); involvement of nurses in end-of-life decision making (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60-0.96; P=.02); good collaboration between nurses and physicians (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.92; P=.009); and freedom to decide how to perform work-related tasks (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.89; P=.002); while a high perceived workload was significantly associated among nurses only(OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.07-2.06; P=.02). Perceived inappropriateness of care was independently associated with higher intent to leave a job (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.04-2.63; P=.03). In the subset of 69 ICUs for which patient data could be linked, clinicians reported received inappropriateness of care in 207 patients, representing 23% (95% CI, 20%-27%) of 883 ICU beds. 
Conclusion Among a group of European and Israeli ICU clinicians, perceptions of inappropriate care were frequently reported and were inversely associated with factors indicating good teamwork.},
  author       = {Piers, Ruth and Azoulay, Elie and Ricou, Bara and Ganz, Freda DeKeyser and Decruyenaere, Johan and Max, Adeline and Michalsen, Andrej and Maia, Paulo Azevedo and Owczuk, Radoslaw and Rubulotta, Francesca and Depuydt, Pieter and Meert, Anne-Pascale and Reyners, Anna K and Aquilina, Andrew and Bekaert, Maarten and Van Den Noortgate, Nele and Schrauwen, Wim J and Benoit, Dominique},
  issn         = {0098-7484},
  journal      = {JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION},
  keywords     = {COMMUNICATION,BURNOUT,DECISIONS,END,FUTILE CARE,NURSING STAFF,CRITICALLY-ILL,ETHICAL DILEMMAS,MORAL DISTRESS,OF-LIFE CARE},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {24},
  pages        = {2694--2703},
  title        = {Perceptions of appropriateness of care among European and Israeli intensive care unit nurses and physicians},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1888},
  volume       = {306},
  year         = {2011},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: