Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Progress in evidence based reproductive surgery

Jan Bosteels, Steven Weyers UGent, C Siristatidis, S Bhattacharya and T D'Hooghe (2011) FACTS, VIEWS & VISION IN OBGYN. 3(4). p.238-244
abstract
The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) was introduced in 1996 to improve the methodological quality of published reports of randomised controlled trials. By doing a systematic review of randomised controlled trials on reproductive surgery, our group can demonstrate that the overall quality of the published reports of randomised studies on reproductive surgical interventions has improved after CONSORT. Nevertheless, some problems still remain. By discussing the benefits and pitfalls of randomised trials in reproductive surgery, our opinion paper aims to stimulate the reader’s further interest in evidence-based practice in reproductive surgery.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
Evidence-based medicine, reproductive surgery., randomised controlled trials
journal title
FACTS, VIEWS & VISION IN OBGYN
Facts Views Vis. ObGyn
volume
3
issue
4
pages
238 - 244
ISSN
2032-0418
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A2
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
2041919
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-2041919
date created
2012-02-23 10:57:09
date last changed
2016-12-19 15:42:02
@article{2041919,
  abstract     = {The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) was introduced in 1996 to improve the methodological quality of published reports of randomised controlled trials. By doing a systematic review of randomised controlled trials on reproductive surgery, our group can demonstrate that the overall quality of the published reports of randomised studies on reproductive surgical interventions has improved after CONSORT. Nevertheless, some problems still remain. By discussing the benefits and pitfalls of randomised trials in reproductive surgery, our opinion paper aims to stimulate the reader{\textquoteright}s further interest in evidence-based practice in reproductive surgery.},
  author       = {Bosteels, Jan  and Weyers, Steven and Siristatidis, C and Bhattacharya, S and D'Hooghe, T},
  issn         = {2032-0418},
  journal      = {FACTS, VIEWS \& VISION IN OBGYN},
  keyword      = {Evidence-based medicine,reproductive surgery.,randomised controlled trials},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {4},
  pages        = {238--244},
  title        = {Progress in evidence based reproductive surgery},
  volume       = {3},
  year         = {2011},
}

Chicago
Bosteels, Jan , Steven Weyers, C Siristatidis, S Bhattacharya, and T D’Hooghe. 2011. “Progress in Evidence Based Reproductive Surgery.” Facts, Views & Vision in Obgyn 3 (4): 238–244.
APA
Bosteels, Jan , Weyers, S., Siristatidis, C., Bhattacharya, S., & D’Hooghe, T. (2011). Progress in evidence based reproductive surgery. FACTS, VIEWS & VISION IN OBGYN, 3(4), 238–244.
Vancouver
1.
Bosteels J, Weyers S, Siristatidis C, Bhattacharya S, D’Hooghe T. Progress in evidence based reproductive surgery. FACTS, VIEWS & VISION IN OBGYN. 2011;3(4):238–44.
MLA
Bosteels, Jan , Steven Weyers, C Siristatidis, et al. “Progress in Evidence Based Reproductive Surgery.” FACTS, VIEWS & VISION IN OBGYN 3.4 (2011): 238–244. Print.