
Language support for L2 speakers of Dutch: effects and motivations
- Author
- Sibo Kanobana (UGent) and Bart Deygers (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- Research at Ghent University (UGent) has shown that non native speakers of Dutch (the main language of instruction at UGent) are less likely to achieve academic success than their L1 peers. Since advanced linguistic skills are key to all aspects of college life, substandard academic language skills can exclude students both socially and academically even though they may have the required talent and intellectual capacity. To help resolve this issue Ghent University launched a language policy unit in 2009. One of the purposes of this project is to eliminate language as a barrier to study success, for both L1 and L2 speakers of Dutch. This paper will focus on one area of expertise of the language policy unit, i.e. the language support workshops for students with an L2 background (L2 workshops). These workshops have been implemented specifically for non-native speakers and are explicitly task-based. This paper will elaborate on the paths that have been tried and rejected (such as a placement test-based system and a social-constructivist inclusive approach) as well as on those that have been pursued. Additionally, this paper will zoom in on the role of students of the Ghent University teacher training program in the L2 workshops. Participating in the workshops requires a future teacher to adopt a different mindset, since both the pedagogical approach and the students are different to what the interns are used to. In order to establish the effect of a non-conventional internship on the teaching beliefs of future teachers, the language policy unit conducted a number of focus groups in April-July 2011. In this paper we will show how and why academic L2 project is conducive to both the linguistic skills of the participants and the teaching beliefs and pedagogic practices of the interns.
- Keywords
- L2, Dutch, Language, NT2, academic language
Downloads
-
Language Support ICERI2011.pdf
- full text
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 164.16 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-2004142
- MLA
- Kanobana, Sibo, and Bart Deygers. “Language Support for L2 Speakers of Dutch: Effects and Motivations.” 4th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Proceedings, edited by L Gómez Chova and I Candel Torres, IATED, 2011, pp. 006544–48.
- APA
- Kanobana, S., & Deygers, B. (2011). Language support for L2 speakers of Dutch: effects and motivations. In L. Gómez Chova & I. Candel Torres (Eds.), 4th international technology, education and development conference, Proceedings (pp. 006544–006548). Madrid, Spain: IATED.
- Chicago author-date
- Kanobana, Sibo, and Bart Deygers. 2011. “Language Support for L2 Speakers of Dutch: Effects and Motivations.” In 4th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Proceedings, edited by L Gómez Chova and I Candel Torres, 006544–48. Madrid, Spain: IATED.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Kanobana, Sibo, and Bart Deygers. 2011. “Language Support for L2 Speakers of Dutch: Effects and Motivations.” In 4th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Proceedings, ed by. L Gómez Chova and I Candel Torres, 006544–006548. Madrid, Spain: IATED.
- Vancouver
- 1.Kanobana S, Deygers B. Language support for L2 speakers of Dutch: effects and motivations. In: Gómez Chova L, Candel Torres I, editors. 4th international technology, education and development conference, Proceedings. Madrid, Spain: IATED; 2011. p. 006544–8.
- IEEE
- [1]S. Kanobana and B. Deygers, “Language support for L2 speakers of Dutch: effects and motivations,” in 4th international technology, education and development conference, Proceedings, Madrid, Spain, 2011, pp. 006544–006548.
@inproceedings{2004142, abstract = {{Research at Ghent University (UGent) has shown that non native speakers of Dutch (the main language of instruction at UGent) are less likely to achieve academic success than their L1 peers. Since advanced linguistic skills are key to all aspects of college life, substandard academic language skills can exclude students both socially and academically even though they may have the required talent and intellectual capacity. To help resolve this issue Ghent University launched a language policy unit in 2009. One of the purposes of this project is to eliminate language as a barrier to study success, for both L1 and L2 speakers of Dutch. This paper will focus on one area of expertise of the language policy unit, i.e. the language support workshops for students with an L2 background (L2 workshops). These workshops have been implemented specifically for non-native speakers and are explicitly task-based. This paper will elaborate on the paths that have been tried and rejected (such as a placement test-based system and a social-constructivist inclusive approach) as well as on those that have been pursued. Additionally, this paper will zoom in on the role of students of the Ghent University teacher training program in the L2 workshops. Participating in the workshops requires a future teacher to adopt a different mindset, since both the pedagogical approach and the students are different to what the interns are used to. In order to establish the effect of a non-conventional internship on the teaching beliefs of future teachers, the language policy unit conducted a number of focus groups in April-July 2011. In this paper we will show how and why academic L2 project is conducive to both the linguistic skills of the participants and the teaching beliefs and pedagogic practices of the interns.}}, author = {{Kanobana, Sibo and Deygers, Bart}}, booktitle = {{4th international technology, education and development conference, Proceedings}}, editor = {{Gómez Chova, L and Candel Torres, I}}, isbn = {{9788461533244}}, keywords = {{L2,Dutch,Language,NT2,academic language}}, language = {{eng}}, location = {{Madrid, Spain}}, pages = {{006544--006548}}, publisher = {{IATED}}, title = {{Language support for L2 speakers of Dutch: effects and motivations}}, year = {{2011}}, }