Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

About the order of divergence of the major bacterial taxa during evolution

Yves Van de Peer UGent, Jean-Marc Neefs, Peter De Rijk, Paul De Vos UGent and Rupert De Wachter (1994) SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY. 17(1). p.32-38
abstract
An evolutionary tree, reconstructed from 1232 bacterial small ribosomal subunit RNA sequences by a distance method, reflects the existence of 11 divisions and a number of subdivisions originally recognized by Woese and collaborators. However, the order of divergence that gave rise to these taxa remains indeterminate and the division of Gram positives and relatives does not behave as a monophyletic taxon. Analysis of the data by a novel approach led to a preferred order of divergence for 10 out of 16 tree nodes, but the Gram positives still behaved as biphyletic.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
RIBOSOMAL RNA, BACTERIAL PHYLOGENY, DATA RESAMPLING, NEIGHBOR-JOINING, PHYLOGENETIC TREE, RIBOSOMAL-SUBUNIT RNA, PHYLOGENETIC POSITION, RELATIVE EFFICIENCIES, GLUTAMINE-SYNTHETASE, MAXIMUM-PARSIMONY, SEQUENCES, TREES, CONSTRUCTION, COMPILATION, EUKARYOTES
journal title
SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Syst. Appl. Microbiol.
volume
17
issue
1
pages
32 - 38
Web of Science type
Article
ISSN
0723-2020
DOI
10.1016/S0723-2020(11)80028-7
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
198279
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-198279
date created
2004-01-14 13:42:00
date last changed
2016-12-19 15:38:10
@article{198279,
  abstract     = {An evolutionary tree, reconstructed from 1232 bacterial small ribosomal subunit RNA sequences by a distance method, reflects the existence of 11 divisions and a number of subdivisions originally recognized by Woese and collaborators. However, the order of divergence that gave rise to these taxa remains indeterminate and the division of Gram positives and relatives does not behave as a monophyletic taxon. Analysis of the data by a novel approach led to a preferred order of divergence for 10 out of 16 tree nodes, but the Gram positives still behaved as biphyletic.},
  author       = {Van de Peer, Yves and Neefs, Jean-Marc and De Rijk, Peter and De Vos, Paul and De Wachter, Rupert},
  issn         = {0723-2020},
  journal      = {SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY},
  keyword      = {RIBOSOMAL RNA,BACTERIAL PHYLOGENY,DATA RESAMPLING,NEIGHBOR-JOINING,PHYLOGENETIC TREE,RIBOSOMAL-SUBUNIT RNA,PHYLOGENETIC POSITION,RELATIVE EFFICIENCIES,GLUTAMINE-SYNTHETASE,MAXIMUM-PARSIMONY,SEQUENCES,TREES,CONSTRUCTION,COMPILATION,EUKARYOTES},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {32--38},
  title        = {About the order of divergence of the major bacterial taxa during evolution},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0723-2020(11)80028-7},
  volume       = {17},
  year         = {1994},
}

Chicago
Van de Peer, Yves, Jean-Marc Neefs, Peter De Rijk, Paul De Vos, and Rupert De Wachter. 1994. “About the Order of Divergence of the Major Bacterial Taxa During Evolution.” Systematic and Applied Microbiology 17 (1): 32–38.
APA
Van de Peer, Y., Neefs, J.-M., De Rijk, P., De Vos, P., & De Wachter, R. (1994). About the order of divergence of the major bacterial taxa during evolution. SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 17(1), 32–38.
Vancouver
1.
Van de Peer Y, Neefs J-M, De Rijk P, De Vos P, De Wachter R. About the order of divergence of the major bacterial taxa during evolution. SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY. 1994;17(1):32–8.
MLA
Van de Peer, Yves, Jean-Marc Neefs, Peter De Rijk, et al. “About the Order of Divergence of the Major Bacterial Taxa During Evolution.” SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY 17.1 (1994): 32–38. Print.