Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Spinoza on the politics of philosophical understanding Susan James and Eric Schliesser angels and philosophers: with a new interpretation of Spinoza's common notions

Eric Schliesser (2011) PROCEEDINGS OF THE ARISTOTELIAN SOCIETY. 111(3 (3)). p.497-518
abstract
In this paper I offer three main challenges to James (2011). All three turn on the nature of philosophy and secure knowledge in Spinoza. First, I criticize James's account of the epistemic role that experience plays in securing adequate ideas for Spinoza. In doing so I criticize her treatment of what is known as the ‘conatus doctrine’ in Spinoza in order to challenge her picture of the relationship between true religion and philosophy. Second, this leads me into a criticism of her account of the nature of philosophy in Spinoza. I argue it is less piecemeal and less akin to what we would recognize as ‘science’ than she suggests. Third, I argue against James's core commitment that Spinoza's three kinds of knowledge differ in degree; I claim they differ in kind. My argument will offer a new interpretation of Spinoza's conception of ‘common notions’. Moreover, I argue that Spinozistic adequate knowledge involves something akin to angelic disembodiment.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
Spinoza, Common Notions, Philosophy, Angels
journal title
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ARISTOTELIAN SOCIETY
editor
Mark Eli Kalderon
volume
111
issue
3 (3)
pages
497 - 518
ISSN
0066-7374
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-9264.2011.00321.x
project
De metafysica en wiskunde van botsingen
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A2
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
VABB id
c:vabb:322831
VABB type
VABB-1
id
1974658
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-1974658
date created
2011-12-28 20:54:52
date last changed
2016-12-19 15:45:31
@article{1974658,
  abstract     = {In this paper I offer three main challenges to James (2011). All three turn on the nature of philosophy and secure knowledge in Spinoza. First, I criticize James's account of the epistemic role that experience plays in securing adequate ideas for Spinoza. In doing so I criticize her treatment of what is known as the {\textquoteleft}conatus doctrine{\textquoteright} in Spinoza in order to challenge her picture of the relationship between true religion and philosophy. Second, this leads me into a criticism of her account of the nature of philosophy in Spinoza. I argue it is less piecemeal and less akin to what we would recognize as {\textquoteleft}science{\textquoteright} than she suggests. Third, I argue against James's core commitment that Spinoza's three kinds of knowledge differ in degree; I claim they differ in kind. My argument will offer a new interpretation of Spinoza's conception of {\textquoteleft}common notions{\textquoteright}. Moreover, I argue that Spinozistic adequate knowledge involves something akin to angelic disembodiment.},
  author       = {Schliesser, Eric},
  editor       = {Kalderon, Mark Eli },
  issn         = {0066-7374},
  journal      = {PROCEEDINGS OF THE ARISTOTELIAN SOCIETY},
  keyword      = {Spinoza,Common Notions,Philosophy,Angels},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {3 (3)},
  pages        = {497--518},
  title        = {Spinoza on the politics of philosophical understanding Susan James and Eric Schliesser angels and philosophers: with a new interpretation of Spinoza's common notions},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2011.00321.x},
  volume       = {111},
  year         = {2011},
}

Chicago
Schliesser, Eric. 2011. “Spinoza on the Politics of Philosophical Understanding Susan James and Eric Schliesser Angels and Philosophers: With a New Interpretation of Spinoza’s Common Notions.” Ed. Mark Eli Kalderon. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3 (3)): 497–518.
APA
Schliesser, E. (2011). Spinoza on the politics of philosophical understanding Susan James and Eric Schliesser angels and philosophers: with a new interpretation of Spinoza’s common notions. (M. E. Kalderon, Ed.)PROCEEDINGS OF THE ARISTOTELIAN SOCIETY, 111(3 (3)), 497–518.
Vancouver
1.
Schliesser E. Spinoza on the politics of philosophical understanding Susan James and Eric Schliesser angels and philosophers: with a new interpretation of Spinoza’s common notions. Kalderon ME, editor. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ARISTOTELIAN SOCIETY. 2011;111(3 (3)):497–518.
MLA
Schliesser, Eric. “Spinoza on the Politics of Philosophical Understanding Susan James and Eric Schliesser Angels and Philosophers: With a New Interpretation of Spinoza’s Common Notions.” Ed. Mark Eli Kalderon. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ARISTOTELIAN SOCIETY 111.3 (3) (2011): 497–518. Print.