Advanced search

Between-method convergent validity of four data collection methods in quantitative means-end-chain research

(2007) FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE. 18(1). p.13-25
Author
Organization
Keywords
laddering, Means-End-Chain (M-E-C) research, PRODUCTS, log-linear modelling, data collection methods, computerised responses, association pattern technique (APT)

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Langbroek, Ivo, and Alain De Beuckelaer. 2007. “Between-method Convergent Validity of Four Data Collection Methods in Quantitative Means-end-chain Research.” Food Quality and Preference 18 (1): 13–25.
APA
Langbroek, I., & De Beuckelaer, A. (2007). Between-method convergent validity of four data collection methods in quantitative means-end-chain research. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 18(1), 13–25.
Vancouver
1.
Langbroek I, De Beuckelaer A. Between-method convergent validity of four data collection methods in quantitative means-end-chain research. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE. 2007;18(1):13–25.
MLA
Langbroek, Ivo, and Alain De Beuckelaer. “Between-method Convergent Validity of Four Data Collection Methods in Quantitative Means-end-chain Research.” FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE 18.1 (2007): 13–25. Print.
@article{1972846,
  author       = {Langbroek, Ivo and De Beuckelaer, Alain},
  issn         = {0950-3293},
  journal      = {FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE},
  keyword      = {laddering,Means-End-Chain (M-E-C) research,PRODUCTS,log-linear modelling,data collection methods,computerised responses,association pattern technique (APT)},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {13--25},
  title        = {Between-method convergent validity of four data collection methods in quantitative means-end-chain research},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.07.009},
  volume       = {18},
  year         = {2007},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: