Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Using ad hoc measures for response styles: a cautionary note

Alain De Beuckelaer UGent, Anouk Rutten and Bert Weijters UGent (2010) QUALITY & QUANTITY. 44(4). p.761-775
abstract
This research note addresses the challenge of how to optimally measure acquiescence response style (ARS) and extreme response style (ERS). This is of crucial importance in assessing results from studies that have tried to identify antecedents of response styles (such as age, education level, national culture). Using survey data from the Netherlands, a comparison is made between the traditional method and a more recently proposed method of measuring ARS and ERS (i.e., the convergent validity across both methods is assessed). The traditional method is based on an ad hoc set of related items. The alternative method uses a set of randomly sampled items to optimize heterogeneity and representativeness of the items. It is found that the traditional method may lead to response style measures that are suboptimal for estimating levels of ARS and ERS as well as relations of ARS and ERS with other variables (like hypothesized antecedents). Recommendations on how to measure response styles are provided.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
INSTRUMENT FRL, Acquiescence/extreme response style, MARKETING-RESEARCH, RATING-SCALES, ACQUIESCENCE, EXTREME, BIAS, COUNTRIES, EDUCATION, Response styles, Between-method convergent validity, Representative indicators for response styles (RIRS)
journal title
QUALITY & QUANTITY
Qual. Quant.
volume
44
issue
4
pages
761 - 775
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000277449600010
JCR category
SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
JCR impact factor
0.688 (2010)
JCR rank
37/83 (2010)
JCR quartile
2 (2010)
ISSN
0033-5177
DOI
10.1007/s11135-009-9225-z
language
English
UGent publication?
no
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
1972817
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-1972817
date created
2011-12-22 10:38:49
date last changed
2012-08-06 10:40:40
@article{1972817,
  abstract     = {This research note addresses the challenge of how to optimally measure acquiescence response style (ARS) and extreme response style (ERS). This is of crucial importance in assessing results from studies that have tried to identify antecedents of response styles (such as age, education level, national culture). Using survey data from the Netherlands, a comparison is made between the traditional method and a more recently proposed method of measuring ARS and ERS (i.e., the convergent validity across both methods is assessed). The traditional method is based on an ad hoc set of related items. The alternative method uses a set of randomly sampled items to optimize heterogeneity and representativeness of the items. It is found that the traditional method may lead to response style measures that are suboptimal for estimating levels of ARS and ERS as well as relations of ARS and ERS with other variables (like hypothesized antecedents). Recommendations on how to measure response styles are provided.},
  author       = {De Beuckelaer, Alain and Rutten, Anouk  and Weijters, Bert},
  issn         = {0033-5177},
  journal      = {QUALITY \& QUANTITY},
  keyword      = {INSTRUMENT FRL,Acquiescence/extreme response style,MARKETING-RESEARCH,RATING-SCALES,ACQUIESCENCE,EXTREME,BIAS,COUNTRIES,EDUCATION,Response styles,Between-method convergent validity,Representative indicators for response styles (RIRS)},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {4},
  pages        = {761--775},
  title        = {Using ad hoc measures for response styles: a cautionary note},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9225-z},
  volume       = {44},
  year         = {2010},
}

Chicago
De Beuckelaer, Alain, Anouk Rutten, and Bert Weijters. 2010. “Using Ad Hoc Measures for Response Styles: a Cautionary Note.” Quality & Quantity 44 (4): 761–775.
APA
De Beuckelaer, A., Rutten, A., & Weijters, B. (2010). Using ad hoc measures for response styles: a cautionary note. QUALITY & QUANTITY, 44(4), 761–775.
Vancouver
1.
De Beuckelaer A, Rutten A, Weijters B. Using ad hoc measures for response styles: a cautionary note. QUALITY & QUANTITY. 2010;44(4):761–75.
MLA
De Beuckelaer, Alain, Anouk Rutten, and Bert Weijters. “Using Ad Hoc Measures for Response Styles: a Cautionary Note.” QUALITY & QUANTITY 44.4 (2010): 761–775. Print.